On 12/20/2015 01:15 PM, Julia Lawall wrote:
> Add NULL test on call to devm_kzalloc.
>
> The semantic match that finds this problem is as follows:
> (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
>
> //
> @@
> expression x;
> identifier fld;
> @@
>
> * x = devm_kzalloc(...);
Add NULL test on call to devm_kzalloc.
The semantic match that finds this problem is as follows:
(http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
//
@@
expression x;
identifier fld;
@@
* x = devm_kzalloc(...);
... when != x == NULL
x->fld
//
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia.law...@lip6.fr>
---
Add NULL tests on various calls to kzalloc and devm_kzalloc.
The semantic match that finds these problems is as follows:
(http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
//
@@
expression x,y;
identifier fld;
@@
(
x = \(vmalloc\|kmalloc\|kzalloc\|kcalloc\|kmem_cache_alloc\|krealloc\|
kmemdup\|kstrdup\|
Here are some basic OMAP test results for Linux v4.3-rc7.
Logs and other details at:
http://www.pwsan.com/omap/testlogs/test_v4.3-rc7/20151025181941/
Test summary
Build: uImage:
Pass ( 3/ 3): omap1_defconfig, omap1_defconfig_1510innovator_only
Here are some basic OMAP test results for Linux v4.3-rc6.
Logs and other details at:
http://www.pwsan.com/omap/testlogs/test_v4.3-rc6/20151018200945/
Test summary
Build: uImage:
Pass ( 3/ 3): omap1_defconfig, omap1_defconfig_1510innovator_only
Writing invalid command to QSPI_SPI_CMD_REG will terminate current
transfer and de-assert the chip select. This has to be done before
calling spi_finalize_current_message(). Because
spi_finalize_current_message() will mark the end of current message
transfer and schedule the next transfer. If the
Here are some basic OMAP test results for Linux v4.3-rc5.
Logs and other details at:
http://www.pwsan.com/omap/testlogs/test_v4.3-rc5/20151011160547/
Test summary
Build: uImage:
Pass ( 3/ 3): omap1_defconfig, omap1_defconfig_1510innovator_only
Here are some basic OMAP test results for Linux v4.3-rc4.
Logs and other details at:
http://www.pwsan.com/omap/testlogs/test_v4.3-rc4/20151004132242/
Test summary
Build: uImage:
Pass ( 3/ 3): omap1_defconfig, omap1_defconfig_1510innovator_only
Here are some basic OMAP test results for Linux v4.3-rc3.
Logs and other details at:
http://www.pwsan.com/omap/testlogs/test_v4.3-rc3/20150927222545/
Test summary
Build: uImage:
Pass ( 3/ 3): omap1_defconfig, omap1_defconfig_1510innovator_only
Here are some basic OMAP test results for Linux v4.3-rc2.
Logs and other details at:
http://www.pwsan.com/omap/testlogs/test_v4.3-rc2/20150920195237/
Test summary
Build: uImage:
Pass ( 3/ 3): omap1_defconfig, omap1_defconfig_1510innovator_only
Here are some basic OMAP test results for Linux v4.2-rc7.
Logs and other details at:
http://www.pwsan.com/omap/testlogs/test_v4.2-rc7/20150816230147/
Test summary
Build: uImage:
Pass ( 3/ 3): omap1_defconfig, omap1_defconfig_1510innovator_only
Here are some basic OMAP test results for Linux v4.2.
Logs and other details at:
http://www.pwsan.com/omap/testlogs/test_v4.2/20150913144826/
Test summary
Build: uImage:
Pass ( 3/ 3): omap1_defconfig, omap1_defconfig_1510innovator_only
Here are some basic OMAP test results for Linux v4.3-rc1.
Logs and other details at:
http://www.pwsan.com/omap/testlogs/test_v4.3-rc1/20150913170656/
Test summary
Build: uImage:
Pass ( 3/ 3): omap1_defconfig, omap1_defconfig_1510innovator_only
Adding COMPILE_TEST flag to ti-soc driver to facilitate
maintenance.
Cc: Zhang Rui
Cc: linux...@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin
---
drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/Kconfig |
Here are some basic OMAP test results for Linux v4.2-rc8.
Logs and other details at:
http://www.pwsan.com/omap/testlogs/test_v4.2-rc8/20150825101923/
Test summary
Build: uImage:
Pass ( 3/ 3): omap1_defconfig, omap1_defconfig_1510innovator_only
Adding COMPILE_TEST flag to ti-soc driver to facilitate
maintenance.
Cc: Zhang Rui
Cc: linux...@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin
---
drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/Kconfig |
Here are some basic OMAP test results for Linux v4.2-rc5.
Logs and other details at:
http://www.pwsan.com/omap/testlogs/test_v4.2-rc5/20150809200304/
Test summary
Build: uImage:
Pass ( 3/ 3): omap1_defconfig, omap1_defconfig_1510innovator_only
Here are some basic OMAP test results for Linux v4.2-rc6.
Logs and other details at:
http://www.pwsan.com/omap/testlogs/test_v4.2-rc6/20150810114017/
Test summary
Build: uImage:
Pass ( 3/ 3): omap1_defconfig, omap1_defconfig_1510innovator_only
Here are some basic OMAP test results for Linux v4.2-rc3.
Logs and other details at:
http://www.pwsan.com/omap/testlogs/test_v4.2-rc3/20150728081114/
Test summary
Build: uImage:
Pass ( 3/ 3): omap1_defconfig, omap1_defconfig_1510innovator_only
Here are some basic OMAP test results for Linux v4.2-rc4.
Logs and other details at:
http://www.pwsan.com/omap/testlogs/test_v4.2-rc4/20150730100856/
Test summary
Build: uImage:
Pass ( 3/ 3): omap1_defconfig, omap1_defconfig_1510innovator_only
Here are some basic OMAP test results for Linux v4.2-rc2.
Logs and other details at:
http://www.pwsan.com/omap/testlogs/test_v4.2-rc2/20150714130012/
Test summary
Build: uImage:
Pass ( 3/ 3): omap1_defconfig, omap1_defconfig_1510innovator_only
Here are some basic OMAP test results for Linux v4.1.
Logs and other details at:
http://www.pwsan.com/omap/testlogs/test_v4.1/20150626170101/
Test summary
Build: uImage:
Pass ( 3/ 3): omap1_defconfig, omap1_defconfig_1510innovator_only
Here are some basic OMAP test results for Linux v4.2-rc1.
Logs and other details at:
http://www.pwsan.com/omap/testlogs/test_v4.2-rc1/20150705171039/
Test summary
Build: uImage:
Pass ( 3/ 3): omap1_defconfig, omap1_defconfig_1510innovator_only
Here are some basic OMAP test results for Linux v4.1-rc8.
Logs and other details at:
http://www.pwsan.com/omap/testlogs/test_v4.1-rc8/20150621202355/
Test summary
Build: uImage:
Pass ( 3/ 3): omap1_defconfig, omap1_defconfig_1510innovator_only
Here are some basic OMAP test results for Linux v4.1-rc7.
Logs and other details at:
http://www.pwsan.com/omap/testlogs/test_v4.1-rc7/20150607230110/
Test summary
Build: uImage:
Pass ( 3/ 3): omap1_defconfig, omap1_defconfig_1510innovator_only
Here are some basic OMAP test results for Linux v4.1-rc6.
Logs and other details at:
http://www.pwsan.com/omap/testlogs/test_v4.1-rc6/20150601012139/
Test summary
Build: uImage:
Pass ( 3/ 3): omap1_defconfig, omap1_defconfig_1510innovator_only
On 06/01/2015 08:49 AM, Paul Walmsley wrote:
+ Tero
Hello Jeroen,
On Mon, 1 Jun 2015, Jeroen Hofstee wrote:
On 30-05-15 17:56, Jeroen Hofstee wrote:
Hello Paul,
On 30-05-15 17:50, Paul Walmsley wrote:
Here are some basic OMAP test results for Linux v4.1-rc5.
Logs and other details
Hi,
On 30-05-15 17:56, Jeroen Hofstee wrote:
Hello Paul,
On 30-05-15 17:50, Paul Walmsley wrote:
Here are some basic OMAP test results for Linux v4.1-rc5.
Logs and other details at:
http://www.pwsan.com/omap/testlogs/test_v4.1-rc5/20150529162206/
The cmt3517 seems to have these some
+ Tero
Hello Jeroen,
On Mon, 1 Jun 2015, Jeroen Hofstee wrote:
On 30-05-15 17:56, Jeroen Hofstee wrote:
Hello Paul,
On 30-05-15 17:50, Paul Walmsley wrote:
Here are some basic OMAP test results for Linux v4.1-rc5.
Logs and other details at:
http://www.pwsan.com/omap
Here are some basic OMAP test results for Linux v4.1-rc5.
Logs and other details at:
http://www.pwsan.com/omap/testlogs/test_v4.1-rc5/20150529162206/
Test summary
Build: uImage:
Pass ( 3/ 3): omap1_defconfig, omap1_defconfig_1510innovator_only
Hello Paul,
On 30-05-15 17:50, Paul Walmsley wrote:
Here are some basic OMAP test results for Linux v4.1-rc5.
Logs and other details at:
http://www.pwsan.com/omap/testlogs/test_v4.1-rc5/20150529162206/
The cmt3517 seems to have these some In-Band errors.
Do you happen to know where
Here are some basic OMAP test results for Linux v4.1-rc1.
Logs and other details at:
http://www.pwsan.com/omap/testlogs/test_v4.1-rc1/20150426200156/
Test summary
Build: uImage:
Pass ( 3/ 3): omap1_defconfig, omap1_defconfig_1510innovator_only
Here are some basic OMAP test results for Linux v4.0-rc7.
Logs and other details at:
http://www.pwsan.com/omap/testlogs/test_v4.0-rc7/20150421071440/
Test summary
Build: uImage:
Pass ( 3/ 3): omap1_defconfig, omap1_defconfig_1510innovator_only
Here are some basic OMAP test results for Linux v4.0.
Logs and other details at:
http://www.pwsan.com/omap/testlogs/test_v4.0/20150421081056/
Test summary
Build: uImage:
Pass ( 3/ 3): omap1_defconfig, omap1_defconfig_1510innovator_only
When the runtime_suspend callback is running, 'runtime_status'
is always RPM_SUSPENDING, so pm_runtime_suspended() will always
fail.
Similarly while the runtime_resume callback is running
'runtime_status' is RPM_RESUMING, so pm_runtime_active() will
always fail.
So remove these two pointless
Here are some basic OMAP test results for Linux v4.0-rc6.
Logs and other details at:
http://www.pwsan.com/omap/testlogs/test_v4.0-rc6/20150401180311/
Test summary
Build: uImage:
Pass ( 3/ 3): omap1_defconfig, omap1_defconfig_1510innovator_only
Here are some basic OMAP test results for Linux v4.0-rc5.
Logs and other details at:
http://www.pwsan.com/omap/testlogs/test_v4.0-rc5/20150324122259/
Test summary
Build: uImage:
Pass ( 3/ 3): omap1_defconfig, omap1_defconfig_1510innovator_only
Here are some basic OMAP test results for Linux v4.0-rc4.
Logs and other details at:
http://www.pwsan.com/omap/testlogs/test_v4.0-rc4/20150315232818/
Test summary
Build: uImage:
Pass ( 3/ 3): omap1_defconfig, omap1_defconfig_1510innovator_only
Here are some basic OMAP test results for Linux v4.0-rc3.
Logs and other details at:
http://www.pwsan.com/omap/testlogs/test_v4.0-rc3/20150308193049/
Test summary
Build: uImage:
Pass ( 3/ 3): omap1_defconfig, omap1_defconfig_1510innovator_only
Here are some basic OMAP test results for Linux v4.0-rc2.
Logs and other details at:
http://www.pwsan.com/omap/testlogs/test_v4.0-rc2/20150303123351/
Test summary
Build: uImage:
Pass ( 3/ 3): omap1_defconfig, omap1_defconfig_1510innovator_only
On Mon, 2 Mar 2015 22:04:44 +0100 Pavel Machek pa...@ucw.cz wrote:
On Tue 2015-02-24 14:40:37, NeilBrown wrote:
If an 'A' plug is inserted, ID should be pulled to ground.
If a 'B' plug, then ID should be floating.
If an Accessory Charger Adapter is inserted, then ID will
be neither
On Tue 2015-02-24 14:40:37, NeilBrown wrote:
If an 'A' plug is inserted, ID should be pulled to ground.
If a 'B' plug, then ID should be floating.
If an Accessory Charger Adapter is inserted, then ID will
be neither grounded nor floating. In this case tell the
USB subsystem that it is an A
Here are some basic OMAP test results for Linux v4.0-rc1.
Logs and other details at:
http://www.pwsan.com/omap/testlogs/test_v4.0-rc1/2015022439/
Test summary
Build: uImage:
Pass ( 3/ 3): omap1_defconfig, omap1_defconfig_1510innovator_only
If an 'A' plug is inserted, ID should be pulled to ground.
If a 'B' plug, then ID should be floating.
If an Accessory Charger Adapter is inserted, then ID will
be neither grounded nor floating. In this case tell the
USB subsystem that it is an A plug, and the battery
charging subsystem that it
Here are some basic OMAP test results for Linux v3.19.
Logs and other details at:
http://www.pwsan.com/omap/testlogs/test_v3.19/20150208213625/
Test summary
Build: uImage:
Pass ( 3/ 3): omap1_defconfig, omap1_defconfig_1510innovator_only
decrease, it's
disturbing to see it happen between an -rc6 and -rc7 release.
Looked into this further. It turns out that the Kconfigs for this test
run were generated from an older kernel version, so the Kconfigs don't
match what's in v3.19-rc7. I've added an additional verification check
Here are some basic OMAP test results for Linux v3.19-rc7.
Logs and other details at:
http://www.pwsan.com/omap/testlogs/test_v3.19-rc7/20150204213018/
Test summary
Build: uImage:
Pass ( 3/ 3): omap1_defconfig, omap1_defconfig_1510innovator_only
Here are some basic OMAP test results for Linux v3.19-rc7.
Logs and other details at:
http://www.pwsan.com/omap/testlogs/test_v3.19-rc7/20150201224202/
Test summary
Build: uImage:
Pass ( 3/ 3): omap1_defconfig, omap1_defconfig_1510innovator_only
Here are some basic OMAP test results for Linux v3.19-rc6.
Logs and other details at:
http://www.pwsan.com/omap/testlogs/test_v3.19-rc6/20150128221837/
Test summary
Build: uImage:
Pass ( 3/ 3): omap1_defconfig, omap1_defconfig_1510innovator_only
Here are some basic OMAP test results for Linux v3.19-rc4.
Logs and other details at:
http://www.pwsan.com/omap/testlogs/test_v3.19-rc4/20150118192109/
Test summary
Build: uImage:
Pass ( 3/ 3): omap1_defconfig, omap1_defconfig_1510innovator_only
Here are some basic OMAP test results for Linux v3.19-rc5.
Logs and other details at:
http://www.pwsan.com/omap/testlogs/test_v3.19-rc5/20150118212155/
Test summary
Build: uImage:
Pass ( 3/ 3): omap1_defconfig, omap1_defconfig_1510innovator_only
Here are some basic OMAP test results for Linux v3.19-rc3.
Logs and other details at:
http://www.pwsan.com/omap/testlogs/test_v3.19-rc3/20150105224749/
Test summary
Build: uImage:
Pass ( 3/ 3): omap1_defconfig, omap1_defconfig_1510innovator_only
On Saturday 03 January 2015 15:44:38 Aaro Koskinen wrote:
On Sat, Jan 03, 2015 at 01:51:53PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Saturday 03 January 2015 07:21:49 Paul Walmsley wrote:
Another ~300KB kernel object size increase for omap2plus_defconfig
kernels.
300kb seems like a lot for
On Saturday 03 January 2015 20:28:28 Paul Walmsley wrote:
On Sat, 3 Jan 2015, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Saturday 03 January 2015 07:21:49 Paul Walmsley wrote:
Another ~300KB kernel object size increase for omap2plus_defconfig
kernels.
300kb seems like a lot for a single release.
On Sun, 4 Jan 2015, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
So 3.16 was by far the largest increase, almost 10x bigger than the 3.19
increase, but
others are quite big as well.
Do you know what happened in 3.16?
It was commit 1413c03893332366e5b4d1e26f942ada25f3e82a (lockdep: Increase
static allocations).
Hi,
On Sun, Jan 04, 2015 at 05:46:31PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Saturday 03 January 2015 15:44:38 Aaro Koskinen wrote:
On Sat, Jan 03, 2015 at 01:51:53PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Saturday 03 January 2015 07:21:49 Paul Walmsley wrote:
Another ~300KB kernel object size
Hi,
On Sat, Jan 03, 2015 at 01:51:53PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Saturday 03 January 2015 07:21:49 Paul Walmsley wrote:
Another ~300KB kernel object size increase for omap2plus_defconfig
kernels.
300kb seems like a lot for a single release. Have you looked into
where this is coming
On Saturday 03 January 2015 07:21:49 Paul Walmsley wrote:
Another ~300KB kernel object size increase for omap2plus_defconfig
kernels.
300kb seems like a lot for a single release. Have you looked into
where this is coming from?
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
On Sat, 3 Jan 2015, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Saturday 03 January 2015 07:21:49 Paul Walmsley wrote:
Another ~300KB kernel object size increase for omap2plus_defconfig
kernels.
300kb seems like a lot for a single release.
+300KB is high, but not exceptionally so.
The data, since I
Here are some basic OMAP test results for Linux v3.19-rc1.
Logs and other details at:
http://www.pwsan.com/omap/testlogs/test_v3.19-rc1/20150102151849/
Test summary
Build: uImage:
Pass ( 3/ 3): omap1_defconfig, omap1_defconfig_1510innovator_only
Here are some basic OMAP test results for Linux v3.19-rc2.
Logs and other details at:
http://www.pwsan.com/omap/testlogs/test_v3.19-rc2/20150102204752/
Test summary
Build: uImage:
Pass ( 3/ 3): omap1_defconfig, omap1_defconfig_1510innovator_only
Here are some basic OMAP test results for Linux v3.18.
Logs and other details at:
http://www.pwsan.com/omap/testlogs/test_v3.18/20141208144211/
Test summary
Build: uImage:
Pass ( 3/ 3): omap1_defconfig, omap1_defconfig_1510innovator_only
Hi Igor,
On Wed, 3 Dec 2014, Igor Grinberg wrote:
On 12/02/14 20:39, Paul Walmsley wrote:
Here are some basic OMAP test results for Linux v3.18-rc7.
Logs and other details at:
http://www.pwsan.com/omap/testlogs/test_v3.18-rc7/20141201203859/
[...]
Boot to userspace
Hi Igor,
On Wed, 3 Dec 2014, Paul Walmsley wrote:
On Wed, 3 Dec 2014, Igor Grinberg wrote:
I've looked at the boot log and it seems cm-t3517 is booting just fine...
Thanks for the note. I will look into this - CM-T3517 should be listed
there.
A problem with the test/report
Here are some basic OMAP test results for Linux v3.18-rc7.
Logs and other details at:
http://www.pwsan.com/omap/testlogs/test_v3.18-rc7/20141201203859/
Test summary
Build: uImage:
Pass ( 3/ 3): omap1_defconfig, omap1_defconfig_1510innovator_only
Here are some basic OMAP test results for Linux v3.18-rc7.
Logs and other details at:
http://www.pwsan.com/omap/testlogs/test_v3.18-rc7/20141201203859/
Test summary
Build: uImage:
Pass ( 3/ 3): omap1_defconfig, omap1_defconfig_1510innovator_only
Hi Paul,
On 12/02/14 20:39, Paul Walmsley wrote:
Here are some basic OMAP test results for Linux v3.18-rc7.
Logs and other details at:
http://www.pwsan.com/omap/testlogs/test_v3.18-rc7/20141201203859/
Test summary
[...]
Build: uImage+dtb:
Pass (13/13
, doesn't
correspond to TRMs[4][5].
It's the one of strange IP I ever seen on TI SOC. And TRM not as detailed as
DSP TRMs.
I think we can pretty easily test the i2c support before things get
merged. I guess it should then be possible to loop two i2c controllers
and run automated tests on them
test patch. Looks like for some time 2430 i2c has not been behaving
reliably unless I force compatible to ti,omap2420-i2c instead of
ti,omap2430-i2c.. The output below is with ti,omap2430-i2c.
Regards,
Tony
8 -
[0.913574] omap_i2c 4807.i2c: init0: STAT=0x; IE=0x601f;
CON
. But it could
introduce new bugs.
Are we ready for that? Thats because IP behavior, sometimes, doesn't correspond
to TRMs[4][5].
It's the one of strange IP I ever seen on TI SOC. And TRM not as detailed as
DSP TRMs.
Yes, I test the patch. But IP handling is really tricky.
So, I doubt.
Looks, like
29 нояб. 2014 г., в 1:13, Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com написал(а):
Looks like for some time 2430 i2c has not been behaving
reliably
commit dd74548ddece4b9d68e5528287a272fa552c81d0 (i2c: omap:
resize fifos before each message) dropped check for dev-buf_len.
As result, data
NOT FOR UPSTREAM
The patch checks if IP reset during probe could bring I2C bus
to a free state on omap2430 - omap3530 boards.
I guess, IP hold one of I2C lines in a low state.
I guess, u-boot haven't sent a stop condition.
The patch is rebased on branch 'i2c/for-next' of
Alexander Kochetkov al.koc...@gmail.com writes:
NOT FOR UPSTREAM
The patch checks if IP reset during probe could bring I2C bus
to a free state on omap2430 - omap3530 boards.
I guess, IP hold one of I2C lines in a low state.
I guess, u-boot haven't sent a stop condition.
The patch is
Here are some basic OMAP test results for Linux v3.18-rc6.
Logs and other details at:
http://www.pwsan.com/omap/testlogs/test_v3.18-rc6/20141123170640/
Test summary
Build: uImage:
Pass ( 3/ 3): omap1_defconfig, omap1_defconfig_1510innovator_only
Here are some basic OMAP test results for Linux v3.18-rc5.
Logs and other details at:
http://www.pwsan.com/omap/testlogs/test_v3.18-rc5/20141119185802/
Test summary
Build: uImage:
Pass ( 3/ 3): omap1_defconfig, omap1_defconfig_1510innovator_only
Here are some basic OMAP test results for Linux v3.18-rc4.
Logs and other details at:
http://www.pwsan.com/omap/testlogs/test_v3.18-rc4/20141110160915/
Test summary
Build: uImage:
Pass ( 3/ 3): omap1_defconfig, omap1_defconfig_1510innovator_only
Here are some basic OMAP test results for Linux v3.18-rc3.
Logs and other details at:
http://www.pwsan.com/omap/testlogs/test_v3.18-rc3/20141105113246/
Test summary
Build: uImage:
Pass ( 3/ 3): omap1_defconfig, omap1_defconfig_1510innovator_only
* Paul Walmsley p...@pwsan.com [141023 08:21]:
On Mon, 20 Oct 2014, Paul Walmsley wrote:
Boot-time memory difference
(delta in bytes from test_v3.17-rc7
(fe82dcec644244676d55a1384c958d5f67979adb))
avail rsrvd high freed board kconfig
-117908k -13164k . -148k
Here are some basic OMAP test results for Linux v3.18-rc2.
Logs and other details at:
http://www.pwsan.com/omap/testlogs/test_v3.18-rc2/20141027002021/
Test summary
Build: uImage:
Pass ( 3/ 3): omap1_defconfig, omap1_defconfig_1510innovator_only
* Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com [141027 08:56]:
* Paul Walmsley p...@pwsan.com [141023 08:21]:
On Mon, 20 Oct 2014, Paul Walmsley wrote:
Boot-time memory difference
(delta in bytes from test_v3.17-rc7
(fe82dcec644244676d55a1384c958d5f67979adb))
avail rsrvd high freed
On Mon, 20 Oct 2014, Paul Walmsley wrote:
Boot-time memory difference
(delta in bytes from test_v3.17-rc7
(fe82dcec644244676d55a1384c958d5f67979adb))
avail rsrvd high freed board kconfig
-117908k -13164k . -148k 2420n800omap2plus_defconfig_n800_only_a
-1012k
Here are some basic OMAP test results for Linux v3.18-rc1.
Logs and other details at:
http://www.pwsan.com/omap/testlogs/test_v3.18-rc1/20141020095901/
Test summary
Build: uImage:
Pass ( 3/ 3): omap1_defconfig, omap1_defconfig_1510innovator_only
Here are some basic OMAP test results for Linux v3.17.
Logs and other details at:
http://www.pwsan.com/omap/testlogs/test_v3.17/20141006085043/
Test summary
Build: uImage:
Pass ( 3/ 3): omap1_defconfig, omap1_defconfig_1510innovator_only
now also work also for 37xxevm,
3530es3beagle and 3530es31beagle in case you want to enable that.
I think this might be an issue of my own inability to communicate clearly
what's being tested here and why :-)
That chip off except CORE PM validation test is only needed due to the
3630/37xx
* Paul Walmsley p...@pwsan.com [141002 08:11]:
Maybe you have some ideas for how this can be communicated better in the
test results? One thing that would probably help is if the board was
renamed to 3730es10beaglexm or something like that. Also maybe
mentioning the fact that the test
Here are some basic OMAP test results for Linux v3.17-rc7.
Logs and other details at:
http://www.pwsan.com/omap/testlogs/test_v3.17-rc7/20140928222901/
Test summary
Build: uImage:
Pass ( 3/ 3): omap1_defconfig, omap1_defconfig_1510innovator_only
* Paul Walmsley p...@pwsan.com [140929 10:14]:
PM: chip off except CORE via suspend:
Pass ( 1/ 1): 3730beaglexm
PM: chip off except CORE via dynamic idle:
Pass ( 1/ 1): 3730beaglexm
Most likely the two tests above should now also work also for 37xxevm,
3530es3beagle and
Here are some basic OMAP test results for Linux v3.17-rc6.
Logs and other details at:
http://www.pwsan.com/omap/testlogs/test_v3.17-rc6/20140921213558/
Test summary
Build: uImage:
Pass ( 3/ 3): omap1_defconfig, omap1_defconfig_1510innovator_only
Here are some basic OMAP test results for Linux v3.17-rc5.
Logs and other details at:
http://www.pwsan.com/omap/testlogs/test_v3.17-rc5/20140916100200/
Test summary
Build: uImage:
Pass ( 3/ 3): omap1_defconfig, omap1_defconfig_1510innovator_only
Here are some basic OMAP test results for Linux v3.17-rc4.
Logs and other details at:
http://www.pwsan.com/omap/testlogs/test_v3.17-rc4/20140910234406/
Test summary
Build: uImage:
Pass ( 3/ 3): omap1_defconfig, omap1_defconfig_1510innovator_only
Hi Paul,
On 09/03/14 02:52, Paul Walmsley wrote:
Here are some basic OMAP test results for Linux v3.17-rc3.
Logs and other details at:
http://www.pwsan.com/omap/testlogs/test_v3.17-rc3/20140902165525/
Test summary
[...]
Boot to userspace:
FAIL ( 2/15
Here are some basic OMAP test results for Linux v3.17-rc3.
Logs and other details at:
http://www.pwsan.com/omap/testlogs/test_v3.17-rc3/20140902165525/
Test summary
Build: zImage:
Pass (16/16): multi_v7_defconfig, omap2plus_defconfig
Here are some basic OMAP test results for Linux v3.17-rc1.
Logs and other details at:
http://www.pwsan.com/omap/testlogs/test_v3.17-rc1/20140821122707/
Test summary
Build: zImage:
Pass (16/16): multi_v7_defconfig, omap2plus_defconfig
Here are some basic OMAP test results for Linux v3.17-rc2.
Logs and other details at:
http://www.pwsan.com/omap/testlogs/test_v3.17-rc2/20140825183438/
Test summary
Build: uImage+dtb:
Pass (10/10): omap2plus_defconfig_am33xx_only/am335x-bone
:
The following patch should fix the tests above for 3530es3beagle.
Care to test and ack as I don't have one?
3530es3beagle retention dynamic idle tests hang on next-20140729.
(Maybe
other boards fail too - haven't tested any others).
I just checked that today's
On Thu, 7 Aug 2014, Felipe Balbi wrote:
we have stable releases for that.
Stable releases aren't a fix for process failures.
- Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-omap in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
On Thu, 7 Aug 2014, Fabio Estevam wrote:
On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 7:21 PM, Paul Walmsley p...@pwsan.com wrote:
It's commit a71e3c37960ce5f9c6a519bc1215e3ba9fa83e75:
Author: Ezequiel Garcia ezequiel.gar...@free-electrons.com
Date: Wed Jul 23 16:47:31 2014 -0300
net: phy: Set the
On Fri, Aug 08, 2014 at 06:11:54AM +, Paul Walmsley wrote:
On Thu, 7 Aug 2014, Felipe Balbi wrote:
we have stable releases for that.
Stable releases aren't a fix for process failures.
of course not, but your claim that there's no way to fix v3.16 is
nonsense. And mistakes occur as
On Fri, 8 Aug 2014, Felipe Balbi wrote:
On Fri, Aug 08, 2014 at 06:11:54AM +, Paul Walmsley wrote:
On Thu, 7 Aug 2014, Felipe Balbi wrote:
we have stable releases for that.
Stable releases aren't a fix for process failures.
of course not, but your claim that there's no way to
Hi,
On Fri, Aug 08, 2014 at 11:39:08PM +, Paul Walmsley wrote:
On Fri, 8 Aug 2014, Felipe Balbi wrote:
On Fri, Aug 08, 2014 at 06:11:54AM +, Paul Walmsley wrote:
On Thu, 7 Aug 2014, Felipe Balbi wrote:
we have stable releases for that.
Stable releases aren't a fix
1 - 100 of 662 matches
Mail list logo