Kevin Wu wrote:
> I don't know. We just use Linux 2.6.14.2 as our code base to
> develop our code.
Sorry, wrong answer. It seems your development model is absolutely
incompatible with the Linux community. I think you are on your own.
If you for whatever reason insist on shipping age old Linux tha
Hi Ralf,
> Deending on the urgency you assign to these patches I can keep them in
> my queue for 2.6.33 and push them upstream for linux-next.
No hurry; 2.6.33 is fine. I've fixed a few typos and thinkos in them and will
resend soon. I'd just like to get these in your queue first, so I can base
On Sat, Oct 03, 2009 at 01:49:42PM +0200, Manuel Lauss wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 12:22 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> >> > Yeah, I saw that you want to remove it, still I don't know why :) Is it
> >> > feature
> >> > incomplete and updating is impossible? Is the concept outdated? Could you
> >>
On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 12:22 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>> > Yeah, I saw that you want to remove it, still I don't know why :) Is it
>> > feature
>> > incomplete and updating is impossible? Is the concept outdated? Could you
>> > enlighten me on that?
>>
>> I started out with the intention to fix it
> > Yeah, I saw that you want to remove it, still I don't know why :) Is it
> > feature
> > incomplete and updating is impossible? Is the concept outdated? Could you
> > enlighten me on that?
>
> I started out with the intention to fix its styling issues, add carddetect irq
> support, etc. In th
