Re: Re: ioports 0x100-0x3af and iomem 0xd000-0xdffff, 0xa0000000-0xa0ffffff -- safe to use on x86 for pcmcia?

2009-11-28 Thread Dominik Brodowski
Hey, On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 08:56:50PM +0900, Komuro wrote: > > Do you think it would be safe to enable these areas by (kernel) default on > > x86? Of course, other entries in /proc/io{mem,ports} would be honoured, > > there > > would be a boot option to disable this feature, and some tests are

Re: [QUESTION] pcmciautils : Is rules-modprobe necessary?

2009-11-28 Thread Dominik Brodowski
Hey, On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 08:15:10PM +0900, Komuro wrote: > > Hi, > > Even if I remove the rules-modprobe below from > /etc/udev/rules.d/60-pcmcia.rules, > pcmcia card driver is loaded properly (for example, pcnet_cs) > > Is rules-modprobe necessary? > > > # modprobe $env{MODALIAS} loads

Re: [PATCH 13/13] pcmcia: rework the irq_req_t typedef

2009-11-28 Thread Dominik Brodowski
Hey, On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 09:33:14AM +0900, Komuro wrote: > >link->irq.Attributes = IRQ_TYPE_DYNAMIC_SHARING|IRQ_FIRST_SHARED; > > IRQ_FIRST_SHARED is not used at all in the pcmcia-subsystem. > so it should be removed. Thanks for the hint. Will make a separate patch out of it (see below) Bes