Hey,
here are some patches relating to the PCMCIA subsystem, and intended for
2.6.34. I'm interested in your input to this patch series. They'll be
sent to the PCMCIA list shortly, with CC to other lists if deemed
appropriate.
pcmcia: make use of pcmcia_dev_resume() return value
pcmci
Hi Dominik,
> here are some patches relating to the PCMCIA subsystem, and intended for
> 2.6.34. I'm interested in your input to this patch series. They'll be
> sent to the PCMCIA list shortly, with CC to other lists if deemed
Looks interesting, I will pull your master(?)-branch this evening and
Hey Wolfram,
On Wed, Jan 06, 2010 at 03:03:32PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > here are some patches relating to the PCMCIA subsystem, and intended for
> > 2.6.34. I'm interested in your input to this patch series. They'll be
> > sent to the PCMCIA list shortly, with CC to other lists if deemed
>
> thanks for testing -- I think module insertion & removal, combined with card
> insertion & ejection or suspend / resume might be the most likely error path
> this time; though I couldn't create any issues here on my test box...
I did the suggested testing now and everything still behaves like th
On Wed, Jan 06, 2010 at 07:30:27PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > thanks for testing -- I think module insertion & removal, combined with card
> > insertion & ejection or suspend / resume might be the most likely error path
> > this time; though I couldn't create any issues here on my test box...
>
On Wed, Jan 06, 2010 at 12:45:31PM +0100, Dominik Brodowski wrote:
> Hey,
>
> here are some patches relating to the PCMCIA subsystem, and intended for
> 2.6.34. I'm interested in your input to this patch series. They'll be
> sent to the PCMCIA list shortly, with CC to other lists if deemed
> appro
Hey,
On Wed, Jan 06, 2010 at 07:30:27PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > thanks for testing -- I think module insertion & removal, combined with card
> > insertion & ejection or suspend / resume might be the most likely error path
> > this time; though I couldn't create any issues here on my test bo
Hey,
On Sat, Jan 09, 2010 at 01:16:34PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> Whole series:
>
> Tested-by: Wolfram Sang
Thanks,
Dominik
___
Linux PCMCIA reimplementation list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pcmcia
Hiya Dominik,
thanks for your assistance!
> Not known to me -- does it also happen with pata_pcmcia.c?
Nope, it doesn't. Never noticed this driver :)
> (1) diff between /proc/ioports before and after inserting the card. Extra
> bonus i you can grab a /proc/ioports before the ide-cs driver is lo
Hey,
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 11:01:49PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> Knowing now that this is a flaw, I digged up something, check the following
> call chain in ide_detach from ide-cs.c:
>
> ide_release -> pcmcia_disable_device -> pcmcia_release_io
>
> Then(!) release_region is called twice, but
Hey,
in order to solve bugzilla bug 13426, and to fix another bug Alexander Kurz
tracked down, I intend to submit a pull request for two additional
patches tomorrow. They're available at
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/brodo/pcmcia-2.6.git urgent
As usual, I'm interested in your in
11 matches
Mail list logo