[RFC] PCMCIA patches for 2.6.34

2010-01-06 Thread Dominik Brodowski
Hey, here are some patches relating to the PCMCIA subsystem, and intended for 2.6.34. I'm interested in your input to this patch series. They'll be sent to the PCMCIA list shortly, with CC to other lists if deemed appropriate. pcmcia: make use of pcmcia_dev_resume() return value pcmci

Re: [RFC] PCMCIA patches for 2.6.34

2010-01-06 Thread Wolfram Sang
Hi Dominik, > here are some patches relating to the PCMCIA subsystem, and intended for > 2.6.34. I'm interested in your input to this patch series. They'll be > sent to the PCMCIA list shortly, with CC to other lists if deemed Looks interesting, I will pull your master(?)-branch this evening and

Re: [RFC] PCMCIA patches for 2.6.34

2010-01-06 Thread Dominik Brodowski
Hey Wolfram, On Wed, Jan 06, 2010 at 03:03:32PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > here are some patches relating to the PCMCIA subsystem, and intended for > > 2.6.34. I'm interested in your input to this patch series. They'll be > > sent to the PCMCIA list shortly, with CC to other lists if deemed >

Re: [RFC] PCMCIA patches for 2.6.34

2010-01-06 Thread Wolfram Sang
> thanks for testing -- I think module insertion & removal, combined with card > insertion & ejection or suspend / resume might be the most likely error path > this time; though I couldn't create any issues here on my test box... I did the suggested testing now and everything still behaves like th

Re: [RFC] PCMCIA patches for 2.6.34

2010-01-09 Thread Wolfram Sang
On Wed, Jan 06, 2010 at 07:30:27PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > thanks for testing -- I think module insertion & removal, combined with card > > insertion & ejection or suspend / resume might be the most likely error path > > this time; though I couldn't create any issues here on my test box... >

Re: [RFC] PCMCIA patches for 2.6.34

2010-01-09 Thread Wolfram Sang
On Wed, Jan 06, 2010 at 12:45:31PM +0100, Dominik Brodowski wrote: > Hey, > > here are some patches relating to the PCMCIA subsystem, and intended for > 2.6.34. I'm interested in your input to this patch series. They'll be > sent to the PCMCIA list shortly, with CC to other lists if deemed > appro

Re: [RFC] PCMCIA patches for 2.6.34

2010-01-09 Thread Dominik Brodowski
Hey, On Wed, Jan 06, 2010 at 07:30:27PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > thanks for testing -- I think module insertion & removal, combined with card > > insertion & ejection or suspend / resume might be the most likely error path > > this time; though I couldn't create any issues here on my test bo

Re: [RFC] PCMCIA patches for 2.6.34

2010-01-09 Thread Dominik Brodowski
Hey, On Sat, Jan 09, 2010 at 01:16:34PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote: > Whole series: > > Tested-by: Wolfram Sang Thanks, Dominik ___ Linux PCMCIA reimplementation list http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pcmcia

Re: [RFC] PCMCIA patches for 2.6.34

2010-01-11 Thread Wolfram Sang
Hiya Dominik, thanks for your assistance! > Not known to me -- does it also happen with pata_pcmcia.c? Nope, it doesn't. Never noticed this driver :) > (1) diff between /proc/ioports before and after inserting the card. Extra > bonus i you can grab a /proc/ioports before the ide-cs driver is lo

Re: [RFC] PCMCIA patches for 2.6.34

2010-01-12 Thread Dominik Brodowski
Hey, On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 11:01:49PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote: > Knowing now that this is a flaw, I digged up something, check the following > call chain in ide_detach from ide-cs.c: > > ide_release -> pcmcia_disable_device -> pcmcia_release_io > > Then(!) release_region is called twice, but

[RFC] PCMCIA patches for 2.6.34-rc5 -- 2nd batch

2010-04-27 Thread Dominik Brodowski
Hey, in order to solve bugzilla bug 13426, and to fix another bug Alexander Kurz tracked down, I intend to submit a pull request for two additional patches tomorrow. They're available at git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/brodo/pcmcia-2.6.git urgent As usual, I'm interested in your in