Am 10.03.2010 17:50, schrieb Steve Jenkins:
I tried just installing mgmtst-racadm-6.1.0-648, which allows me to run
racadm. However, running racadm sysinfo gives me:
---
ERROR: RACADM is unable to process the requested subcommand because
there is no
local RAC configuration to
Firmware Update= NA
Hardware Version= A04
Any way to fix this ?
Cheers
Nick
__ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
signature database 4934 (20100311) __
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.eset.com
On 11/03/10 12:53, Nick Lunt wrote:
Hi
DRAC 5 console with Firefox 3.0.5 on Red Hat keeps saying I need to
install the console re-direction plugin. I click yes, install it,
restart firefox, but it says I need to install the console re-direction
plugin again.
Firmware Version=
FOR A PARTICULAR
PURPOSE.
# cat /etc/redhat-release
Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 5.3 (Tikanga)
I take it I need to install a 'real' jre ?
Thanks
Nick.
__ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
signature database 4935 (20100311) __
The message was checked
On Thu, March 11, 2010 11:17, Dan Pritts wrote:
On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 04:54:44PM -0600, John G. Heim wrote:
Has anyone configured a database server with RAID-5? Is it really a bad
idea
http://www.orafaq.com/wiki/RAID
Which says that unless money is no object, go with RAID 5.
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 11:26 AM, J. Epperson
d...@epperson.homelinux.net wrote:
On Thu, March 11, 2010 11:17, Dan Pritts wrote:
On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 04:54:44PM -0600, John G. Heim wrote:
Has anyone configured a database server with RAID-5? Is it really a bad
idea
On 2010-03-11 18:09, Preston Hagar wrote:
Actually it says if money is no object, go with RAID 10:
http://www.orafaq.com/wiki/RAID#RAID_10
RAID 10 is the ideal RAID level in terms of performance and
availability, but it can be expensive as it requires at least twice
the amount of disk
Hi
I think if you use raid1 with at least 1 hotspare, you're pretty secure
with a high datatransfer..
If one disk fails then the hotspare takes it place and gives the time to
replace the broken disk..
Recently I put an old server from raid5 to raid1, because of the
progresql. they recommended the
Quoting J. Epperson d...@epperson.homelinux.net:
On Thu, March 11, 2010 11:17, Dan Pritts wrote:
On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 04:54:44PM -0600, John G. Heim wrote:
Has anyone configured a database server with RAID-5? Is it really a bad
idea
http://www.orafaq.com/wiki/RAID
Which says that
Quoting Jefferson Ogata powere...@antibozo.net:
I've got several hundred disks running on RAID 5 and I've had one actual
full RAID failure in 10 years, and that was my fault.
You've been lucky! :)
In 10 years, I've think I've had 3 RAID 5 failures (all rebuilt without
problems).
In terms of
On 2010-03-11 19:48, Eric Rostetter wrote:
Quoting Jefferson Ogata powere...@antibozo.net:
I've got several hundred disks running on RAID 5 and I've had one actual
full RAID failure in 10 years, and that was my fault.
You've been lucky! :)
In 10 years, I've think I've had 3 RAID 5
Quoting Jefferson Ogata powere...@antibozo.net:
That's not what I mean by a full RAID failure.
My mistake; I just glossed right over the word full as if it wasn't
there... Sorry about that... Brain fart I guess
--
Eric Rostetter
The Department of Physics
The University of Texas at
Yes, if the CDROM is not recognized as local, then you will need to create a
repository that is accessible from NFS, FTP or HTTP.
I recently created a RHEL5 repository to use as an NFS export. Here is the
worksheet that I used:
Paul
# createrepo.txt
#
# Tuesday, 15-Sep-2009, create rhel5
Jefferson Ogata wrote:
That's not what I mean by a full RAID failure. I've had plenty of disks
fail and subsequent successful rebuilds. I'm saying on one occasion
(because of an oversight) I ended up with an unrecoverable RAID 5
because of disk failures.
Of course, this wasn't a serious
On 2010-03-12 01:31, Paul M. Dyer wrote:
Sorry Stephen, but that will not work.
The iso is setup in the comps to be a CD/DVD. The process of creating a
repository rebuilds the comps for the new media, i.e. harddisk.
I have no problem using the iso image directly.
I also have no problem
On Fri, 2010-03-12 at 02:23 +, Jefferson Ogata wrote:
On 2010-03-11 22:23, Matthew Geier wrote:
I've had a disk fail in such a way on a SCSI array that all disks on
that SCSI bus became unavailable simultaneously. When half the disks
dropped of the array at the same time, it gave up and
from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
signature database 4935 (20100311) __
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.eset.com
___
Linux-PowerEdge mailing list
Linux-PowerEdge@dell.com
https://lists.us.dell.com/mailman
hI,all
my server is dell r200, install OMI-SrvAdmin-Dell-Web-LX-620-
677.rhel5.tar.gz on centos 5.1 I got some errors :
error: Failed dependencies:
libcmpiCppImpl.so.0 is needed by
srvadmin-itunnelprovider-6.2.0-1.6.el5.i386
libcmpiCppImpl0 = 2.0.0 is needed
On 2010-03-12 04:26, Craig White wrote:
On Fri, 2010-03-12 at 02:23 +, Jefferson Ogata wrote:
On 2010-03-11 22:23, Matthew Geier wrote:
I've had a disk fail in such a way on a SCSI array that all disks on
that SCSI bus became unavailable simultaneously. When half the disks
dropped of the
-Original Message-
From: linux-poweredge-boun...@dell.com
[mailto:linux-poweredge-boun...@dell.com] On Behalf Of Paul M.
Dyer
Sent: vrijdag 12 maart 2010 2:31
To: linux-powere...@lists.us.dell.com
Subject: Re: Installing RHEL5 via DRAC
Sorry Stephen, but that will not work.
20 matches
Mail list logo
