This might be the issue described here:
http://en.community.dell.com/dell-blogs/enterprise/b/tech-center/archive/2010/07/12/amd-opteron-6100-processors-and-red-hat-enterprise-linux-5.aspx
--
Charles Rose
Linux Engineering
From: linux-poweredge-bounces-Lists On Behalf Of Iyer, Shyam
Sent: Tuesday
Got a message from the linux-poweredge@dell.com mailman interface last
night claiming:
"Your membership in the mailing list Linux-PowerEdge has been disabled
due to excessive bounces The last bounce received from you was dated
31-Oct-2010. You will not get any more messages from this list until
Hi all, Thanks in advance.
i have this dell server and i like install debin Lenny on it, i have
configured a RAID 0 enviroment but when the OS install arrive to the
disc detec, it say that isn't a hard disc.
I need extra driver for it?
Please Help Me.
Hermidio
_
https://access.redhat.com/kb/docs/DOC-31516
This issue also affects the R415/R515. There should be an errata kernel for
CentOS 5.5 x86 as well, I gather.
Jose De la Rosa
Linux Engineering
Dell | Enterprise Product Group
From: linux-poweredge-bounces-Lists On Behalf Of Iyer, Shyam
Sent: Monday,
> Hi Jeffrey..
> :-(
> nope
>
> lsmod:
> megaraid_sas 88520 2
> sd_mod 56257 5
> scsi_mod 188665 6
> mptctl,sg,usb_storage,libata,megaraid_sas,sd_mod
>
> dkms module exists and is loaded.
> version:
> megaraid_sas-v00.00.04.29
>
> update_firmware gives s
Hi Jeffrey..
:-(
nope
lsmod:
megaraid_sas 88520 2
sd_mod 56257 5
scsi_mod 188665 6
mptctl,sg,usb_storage,libata,megaraid_sas,sd_mod
dkms module exists and is loaded.
version:
megaraid_sas-v00.00.04.29
update_firmware gives same output..
I let it res
Do you have panic trace , screenshot and config details. ?
-Shyam Iyer
From: linux-poweredge-bounces-Lists On Behalf Of Drew Weaver
Sent: Monday, November 01, 2010 3:31 PM
To: linux-poweredge-Lists
Subject: R415 doesn't work with x86 Linux?
Is there some kind of architecture limitation that make
> I am already using those repos, however they are not working for me.
>
> Here's the output of "update_firmware --yes":
...
> - Installing dell_dup_componentid_00159 - 1.4.7Installation failed
> for
> package: dell_dup_componentid_00159 - 1.4.7
> aborting update...
>
> The error message from
Is there some kind of architecture limitation that makes the PowerEdge R415 not
work with x86 versions of Linux?
For example both CentOS 5.5 and Fedora 13 x86 kernel panic when attempting to
install.
It seems that CentOS 5.5 x86_64 works fine though.
Any thoughts?
_
On 01/11/10 14:47, jeffrey_l_mend...@dell.com wrote:
> Hi Tim and Robin,
>
> I believe you're referring to the ".BIN" self-contained update
> package. Based on customer feedback on this list and elsewhere, we
> made the yum-repo based firmware updates officially supported
> starting with OM 6.2 i
I should mention we have never had this issue when we weren't running the
servers with 1 Disk RAID-0 VDs.
We have hundreds of systems with RAID-1, etc that all work perfectly.
thanks,
-Drew
-Original Message-
From: linux-poweredge-boun...@dell.com
[mailto:linux-poweredge-boun...@dell.
tnx Jeffrey,
I'm checking it out at the moment..
I will give feedback as soon as I have.
But at quick look, it seems that the magaraid_sas is installed, but not
loaded..
I'll dive further into it.
i'll let it know.. tnx again.. this was helpfull.. :-)
> Arno,
>
> I think I know what is going
> Don't use Dell's buggy, overly-complex scripts (self-extracting shell
> scripts, which then install RPMs - makes me feel nauseous just
> thinking about the concept
> Any self-respecting admin will *not* blindly run shell scripts *as root*
> which unpack a self-contained payload and perform ac
> Hi,
Hi,
> We have a CentOS 5.5 server that has two disks that are 'not raided'
> connected to the backplane.
We are using debian stable.
> Dell support told us to create 1 disk RAID-0 volumes when we need to do
> this since there is no way to just have the drive pass through (like the
> SAS c
Hi,
We have a CentOS 5.5 server that has two disks that are 'not raided' connected
to the backplane.
Dell support told us to create 1 disk RAID-0 volumes when we need to do this
since there is no way to just have the drive pass through (like the SAS
controllers do).
I have noticed that a lot
On 31/10/10 22:12, Arno van der Veen wrote:
> wrote:
>
>> Guys,
>>
>> Just an FYI. I work in support , and if you modify the scripts , you
>> risk damaging your data , and do u think your firms would appreciate
>> your calling us , with a severity 1 , and at a data loss ?
>>
>> You risk warranty
16 matches
Mail list logo