Re: RAID5 problem

2005-12-08 Thread David Greaves
Ross Vandegrift wrote: On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 11:07:36AM +1100, James Neale wrote: Hi Ross I'm a bit of a mdadm newb and have been wrangling with -monitor rather unsucccessfully. Currently I'm manually checking /proc/mdstat until I've sorted out something better. I'm running a single 1TB

Re: Journal-guided Resynchronization for Software RAID

2005-12-08 Thread Holger Kiehl
On Mon, 5 Dec 2005, Neil Brown wrote: On Friday December 2, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 1 Dec 2005, Neil Brown wrote: What I would really like is a cheap (Well, not too expensive) board that had at least 100Meg of NVRAM which was addressable on the PCI buss, and an XOR and RAID-6 engine

Re: Journal-guided Resynchronization for Software RAID

2005-12-08 Thread dean gaudet
On Mon, 5 Dec 2005, Neil Brown wrote: One of these with built in xor and raid6 would be nice, but I'm not sure I could guarantee a big enough market for them to try convincing them to make one... i wonder if the areca cards http://www.areca.com.tw/ are re-programmable... they seem to have

Re: RAID5 resync question BUGREPORT!

2005-12-08 Thread JaniD++
Hello, Neil, [EMAIL PROTECTED] mdadm-2.2]# mdadm --grow /dev/md0 --bitmap=internal mdadm: Warning - bitmaps created on this kernel are not portable between different architectured. Consider upgrading the Linux kernel. Dec 8 23:59:45 st-0001 kernel: md0: bitmap file is out of date (0

Re: RAID5 resync question BUGREPORT!

2005-12-08 Thread Neil Brown
On Friday December 9, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, Neil, [EMAIL PROTECTED] mdadm-2.2]# mdadm --grow /dev/md0 --bitmap=internal mdadm: Warning - bitmaps created on this kernel are not portable between different architectured. Consider upgrading the Linux kernel. Dec 8 23:59:45

Re: raid5 in degraded mode; trying to revive

2005-12-08 Thread Neil Brown
On Wednesday December 7, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Neil, could u elaborate on kernel/mdadm version this bug was fixed ? i having the same problem myslef. It was fixed in 2.6.12-rc5 The mddev-queue-unplug function was being set to early in 'run', and if run failed, it would still be set, so

Re: RAID5 resync question BUGREPORT!

2005-12-08 Thread JaniD++
Hi, After i get this on one of my disk node, imediately send this letter, and go to the hosting company, to see, is any message on the screen. But unfortunately nothing what i found. simple freeze. no message, no ping, no num lock! The full message of the node next reboot is here:

Re: RAID5 resync question BUGREPORT!

2005-12-08 Thread Neil Brown
On Friday December 9, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, After i get this on one of my disk node, imediately send this letter, and go to the hosting company, to see, is any message on the screen. But unfortunately nothing what i found. simple freeze. no message, no ping, no num lock! The full

Re: mdadm source rpm build error + command-line parsing error + resync reporting problem

2005-12-08 Thread Neil Brown
On Thursday December 8, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I got this when I attempted to rpmbuild -ba mdadm.spec: In file included from super0.c:31: /usr/include/asm/byteorder.h:6:2: error: #warning using private kernel header; include endian.h instead! make: ***

Re: mdadm source rpm build error + command-line parsing error + resync reporting problem

2005-12-08 Thread Neil Brown
On Thursday December 8, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Not really on-topic, but has anyone else gotten ext2online to work? I get this Dec 8 21:27:02 istanbul kernel: JBD: ext2online wants too many credits (2050 2048) after letting it attempt to extend the FS to cover the entire device. I