Hi
Our suggestion worked out nicely so I could recover the data from the
raid.
Thanks
Hendrik Naumann
Am Freitag, 16. Dezember 2005 18:26 schrieben Sie:
> On Fri, 2005-12-16 at 06:45, Hendrik Naumann wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > I have a Linux-Software-Raid5 consisting of three partitions
> > (hda2
JaniD++ wrote:
> For me, the performance bottleneck is cleanly about RAID0 layer used
> exactly as "concentrator" to join the 4x2TB to 1x8TB.
Did you try running RAID0 over nbd directly and found it to be faster?
IIRC, stacking raid modules does need a considerable amount of tuning, and
even the
- Original Message -
From: "Neil Brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "JaniD++" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Monday, December 19, 2005 1:57 AM
Subject: Re: RAID5 resync question BUGREPORT!
> On Thursday November 17, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Now i trying the patch
> >
>
On Monday December 19, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> hello neil, hello all!
>
> i have only a small single question, which i cannot solve via searching
> the web.
>
> i got an raid1 with 2 scsi disk (2x 73g) and have the state "dirty,
> no-errors".
>
> what can i do to get a REAL CLEAN state - both
hello neil, hello all!
i have only a small single question, which i cannot solve via searching
the web.
i got an raid1 with 2 scsi disk (2x 73g) and have the state "dirty,
no-errors".
what can i do to get a REAL CLEAN state - both disks are on, active
sync.
snipplet -
mdadm -D /dev/md1
Neil Brown wrote:
Converting a raid5 to a raid6 with 2 extra drives (thus having more
space as well as more redundancy)
Yeah! That's me :D
is a possibility as the extra space
can be effectively used to keep to old copy of a stripe safe while
writing the new copy.
This sort of conversion is
