On Sat, 1 Apr 2006, Alex Izvorski wrote:
> On Sat, 2006-04-01 at 14:28 -0800, dean gaudet wrote:
> > i'm guessing there's a good reason for STRIPE_SIZE being 4KiB -- 'cause
> > otherwise it'd be cool to run with STRIPE_SIZE the same as your raid
> > chunksize... which would decrease the number
On Sat, 2006-04-01 at 14:28 -0800, dean gaudet wrote:
> i'm guessing there's a good reason for STRIPE_SIZE being 4KiB -- 'cause
> otherwise it'd be cool to run with STRIPE_SIZE the same as your raid
> chunksize... which would decrease the number of entries -- much more
> desirable than increasin
> well? are you guys tapped out on this or should I be looking elsewhere?
> The *was* the recommended place to seek out help.
> still waiting
netiquette hint: if you don't get a reply, you need to first verify
that you provided all possible diagnostic info in a clear, succinct message,
and
> >Mar 29 23:33:26 A1 kernel: ata6: status=0x51 { DriveReady SeekComplete Error
> >}
> >Mar 29 23:33:26 A1 kernel: ata6: error=0x84 { DriveStatusError BadCRC }
BadCRC is unambiguous: the packet was corrupted. that could happen several
ways, the most common of which is bogus cables (remember, PAT
On Sat, 1 Apr 2006, Alex Izvorski wrote:
> Dean - I think I see what you mean, you're looking at this line in the
> assembly?
>
> 65830 16.8830 : c1f: cmp%rcx,0x28(%rax)
yup that's the one... that's probably a fair number of cache (or tlb)
misses going on right there.
> I looked
On Sat, 2006-03-25 at 21:38 -0800, dean gaudet wrote:
> On Sat, 25 Mar 2006, Alex Izvorski wrote:
>
> > http://linuxraid.pastebin.com/621363 - oprofile annotated assembly
>
> it looks to me like a lot of time is spent in __find_stripe() ... i wonder
> if the hash is working properly.
>
> in ra
Christopher Smith wrote:
Brad Campbell wrote:
I've been running 3 together in one box for about 18 months, and four
in another for a year now... the on board BIOS will only pickup 8
drives, but they work just fine under Linux and recognise all
connected drives.
What distro and kernel ?
Err
Mitchell Laks wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I have a production server in place at a remote site.
>I have a single system drive that is an ide drive
>and two data drives that are on a via SATA controller in a raid1
>configuration.
>
>I am monitoring the /var/log/messages and I get messages every few days
>
>M
Brad Campbell wrote:
I've been running 3 together in one box for about 18 months, and four in
another for a year now... the on board BIOS will only pickup 8 drives,
but they work just fine under Linux and recognise all connected drives.
What distro and kernel ?
I tried this about 2 - 3 months
On Friday 31 March 2006 22:27, Mike Hardy wrote:
> Well, honestly I'm not really sure. I've never done this as I only use
> the redundant raid levels, and when they're gone, things are a complete
> hash and there's no hope. In fact, with raid-0 (striping, right? not
> linear/append?) I believe you
10 matches
Mail list logo
