On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 09:18:57PM -0400, Bill Davidsen wrote:
> Erik Mouw wrote:
> >No, the other way around: RAID1 is a special case of RAID5.
> >
> No it isn't. If you have N drives in RAID1 you have N independent copies
> of the data and no parity, there's just no corresponding thing in RAID5,
On Friday May 5, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Sorry, I couldn't find a diplomatic way to say you're completely wrong.
>
> We don't necessarily expect a diplomatic way, but a clear and
> intelligent one would be helpful.
>
> In two-disk RAID5 which is it?
>
> 1) The 'parity bit' is the same
> Sorry, I couldn't find a diplomatic way to say you're completely wrong.
We don't necessarily expect a diplomatic way, but a clear and
intelligent one would be helpful.
In two-disk RAID5 which is it?
1) The 'parity bit' is the same as the datum.
2) The parity bit is the complement of the
