Re: raid5 write performance

2007-03-31 Thread Bill Davidsen
Raz Ben-Jehuda(caro) wrote: On 3/31/07, Bill Davidsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Raz Ben-Jehuda(caro) wrote: > Please see bellow. > > On 8/28/06, Neil Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Sunday August 13, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> > well ... me again >> > >> > Following your advice >> >

Re: raid5 write performance

2007-03-31 Thread Raz Ben-Jehuda(caro)
On 3/31/07, Bill Davidsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Raz Ben-Jehuda(caro) wrote: > Please see bellow. > > On 8/28/06, Neil Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Sunday August 13, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> > well ... me again >> > >> > Following your advice >> > >> > I added a deadline for

Re: raid5 write performance

2007-03-31 Thread Bill Davidsen
Raz Ben-Jehuda(caro) wrote: Please see bellow. On 8/28/06, Neil Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Sunday August 13, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > well ... me again > > Following your advice > > I added a deadline for every WRITE stripe head when it is created. > in raid5_activate_delayed i c

Re: raid6 array , part id 'fd' not assembling at boot .

2007-03-31 Thread Nix
On 19 Mar 2007, James W. Laferriere outgrabe: > What I don't see is the reasoning behind the use of initrd . It's a > kernel ran to put the dev tree in order , start up devices ,... Just to > start the kernel again ? That's not what initrds do. No second kernel is started, and