Raz Ben-Jehuda(caro) wrote:
On 3/31/07, Bill Davidsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Raz Ben-Jehuda(caro) wrote:
> Please see bellow.
>
> On 8/28/06, Neil Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Sunday August 13, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> > well ... me again
>> >
>> > Following your advice
>> >
On 3/31/07, Bill Davidsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Raz Ben-Jehuda(caro) wrote:
> Please see bellow.
>
> On 8/28/06, Neil Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Sunday August 13, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> > well ... me again
>> >
>> > Following your advice
>> >
>> > I added a deadline for
Raz Ben-Jehuda(caro) wrote:
Please see bellow.
On 8/28/06, Neil Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sunday August 13, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> well ... me again
>
> Following your advice
>
> I added a deadline for every WRITE stripe head when it is created.
> in raid5_activate_delayed i c
On 19 Mar 2007, James W. Laferriere outgrabe:
> What I don't see is the reasoning behind the use of initrd . It's a
> kernel ran to put the dev tree in order , start up devices ,... Just to
> start the kernel again ?
That's not what initrds do. No second kernel is started, and