Hi,
On Thu, 19 Apr 2007, Daniel Korstad wrote:
> I have used lv with my past raid sets and it is very nice, adds some
> flexibility.
>
> I have also done a RAID5 reshape that was in an lv. Unfortunately, at
> the time I had an older LVM version that did not support pvresize. So I
> was stuck
I have used lv with my past raid sets and it is very nice, adds some
flexibility.
I have also done a RAID5 reshape that was in an lv. Unfortunately, at the time
I had an older LVM version that did not support pvresize. So I was stuck with
a larger RAID set and my lv would not take advantage
Hi Folks,
I recently upgraded all four disks of a RAID5 array and then used "mdadm
--grow" to grow the raid array into the new bigger partitions available to
it and ran resize2fs. Lovely.
However, I've just tried this again on a similar machine and have grown the
array. However, I've just not
On Thursday April 19, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Neil Hello
> I have been doing some thinking. I feel we should take a different path here.
> In my tests I actually accumulate the user's buffers and when ready I submit
> them, an elevator like algorithm.
>
> The main problem is the amount of I
On 4/16/07, Raz Ben-Jehuda(caro) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 4/13/07, Neil Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Saturday March 31, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > 4.
> > I am going to work on this with other configurations, such as raid5's
> > with more disks and raid50. I will be happy to h