Never mind, didn't notice the subject said RAID 0, I took the body of the
message to mean raid 1 or 5
On Sun, 15 Apr 2001, Per Jessen wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Apr 2001 18:31:36 -, Craig Servin wrote:
>
> >I am curious if swap on raid works in the 2.4 kernels. If anyone could let me
> >know I
On Sun, 15 Apr 2001, Per Jessen wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Apr 2001 18:31:36 -, Craig Servin wrote:
>
> >I am curious if swap on raid works in the 2.4 kernels. If anyone could let me
> >know I would appreciate it.
>
> But would it - necessarily - make sense ? if you use multiple swap-paritions,
> Documentation/md.txt asserts that only linear and raid0 can be used for /
> and keep lilo sane, yet redhat (and others) seem to be able to handle / as
> raid1 just fine. i was just trying to install my own custom kernel and
> ran into issues on running lilo (sorry i forget the exact error --
>
>
> Hmmm...now that I think about this, am I doing this completely wrong?
> Would the system have recovered if I had partitioned the disks with
> FD (RAID autodetect)? Does RAID autodetect attempt to effectively add
> all possible disks at once?
>
good thinking. autodetect reads the disk info f
On Sun, 8 Oct 2000, D. Lance Robinson wrote:
> You were most likely doing a 'mkfs -b 4096' after creating an array and
naw I've seen this message many times simply while re-booting one of
my raid systems. Doesn't seem to harm anything, BUT... was defintely not
doing any mkfs's on a worki
On Thu, 31 Aug 2000, Neil Brown wrote:
> On Wednesday August 30, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > I have strange messages in my kernel log (1-2 messages per day)
> >
> > raid5: bug: stripe->bh_new[2], sector 477640 exists
> > raid5: bh 8ffd6da0, bh_new 8ffd63e0
> > raid5: bug: stripe->bh_new[2]
