On Friday January 20, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Though now that I look at it, don't we have a circular reference
> here? Let me quote the code section, which starts of with where I was
> confused:
..
>
> Now we seem to end up with:
>
> mddev->private = conf;
> conf->mddev = mddev;
> "Neil" == Neil Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Neil> On Tuesday January 17, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> > "NeilBrown" == NeilBrown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
NeilBrown> Previously the array of disk information was included in
NeilBrown> the raid5 'conf' structure which was alloca
On Tuesday January 17, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > "NeilBrown" == NeilBrown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> NeilBrown> Previously the array of disk information was included in
> NeilBrown> the raid5 'conf' structure which was allocated to an
> NeilBrown> appropriate size. This makes it awkw
> "NeilBrown" == NeilBrown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
NeilBrown> Previously the array of disk information was included in
NeilBrown> the raid5 'conf' structure which was allocated to an
NeilBrown> appropriate size. This makes it awkward to change the size
NeilBrown> of that array. So we sp
