Re: Adding Reed-Solomon Personality to MD, need help/advice

2006-01-08 Thread Bill Davidsen
Bailey, Scott wrote: Interestingly, I was just browsing this paper http://www.cs.utk.edu/%7Eplank/plank/papers/CS-05-569.html which appears to be quite on-topic for this discussion. I admit my eyes glaze over during intensive math discussions but it appears tuned RS might not be as horrible as y

Re: Adding Reed-Solomon Personality to MD, need help/advice

2006-01-04 Thread Jeff Breidenbach
Interesting paper, thanks. Unfortunately, decode bandwidth when erasures are present (e.g. drives have failed) is not discussed. This is by far the speed bottleneck for Reed-Solomon and a potential hangup for a RS personality in md. Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe

RE: Adding Reed-Solomon Personality to MD, need help/advice

2006-01-03 Thread Bailey, Scott
ssions to become non-academic for me, :-) Scott -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of H. Peter Anvin Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2005 1:41 PM To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Adding Reed-Solomon Personality to MD, need help

Re: Adding Reed-Solomon Personality to MD, need help/advice

2005-12-29 Thread H. Peter Anvin
Jeff Breidenbach wrote: The fundamental problem is that generic RS requires table lookups even in the common case, whereas RAID-6 uses shortcuts to substantially speed up the computation in the common case. If one wanted to support a typical 8-bit RS code (which supports a max of 256 drives, i

Re: Adding Reed-Solomon Personality to MD, need help/advice

2005-12-29 Thread Jeff Breidenbach
> The fundamental problem is that generic RS requires table lookups even > in the common case, whereas RAID-6 uses shortcuts to substantially > speed up the computation in the common case. If one wanted to support a typical 8-bit RS code (which supports a max of 256 drives, including ECC drives) i

Re: Adding Reed-Solomon Personality to MD, need help/advice

2005-12-29 Thread Bill Rugolsky Jr.
On Thu, Dec 29, 2005 at 10:40:33AM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > It's not really in-between; generic RS RAID would be many times slower > than either; however, unlike raid10 it could survive *any* m failures > where m is the number of redundancy drives. > > The fundamental problem is that generic

Re: Adding Reed-Solomon Personality to MD, need help/advice

2005-12-29 Thread H. Peter Anvin
Followup to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> By author:"Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> In newsgroup: linux.dev.raid > > Hello, > > Nathan Lewis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > As part of my Master's thesis, I am working on adding a Reed-Solomon > > personality to the existing linux RAID str

Re: Adding Reed-Solomon Personality to MD, need help/advice

2005-11-21 Thread Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe
Hello, Nathan Lewis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > As part of my Master's thesis, I am working on adding a Reed-Solomon > personality to the existing linux RAID structure and I would like some Is there any progress in implementing a generic Reed-Solomon personality in MD since this mail from 31 J