Thanks much, Neil, will try.
Thanks,
Maxim.
NB> On Saturday July 9, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> On Thursday July 7, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> > Hi Neil!
>> > Thanks much for your help, array creation using devel-2 just works,
>> > however, the array can't be assembled again after it's stopped:
On Saturday July 9, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Thursday July 7, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Hi Neil!
> > Thanks much for your help, array creation using devel-2 just works,
> > however, the array can't be assembled again after it's stopped:(
>
> Hmm, yeh, nor it can :-(
>
> I'm not sure when
On Thursday July 7, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi Neil!
> Thanks much for your help, array creation using devel-2 just works,
> however, the array can't be assembled again after it's stopped:(
Hmm, yeh, nor it can :-(
I'm not sure when I'll have time to look at this (I'm on leave at the
moment wi
Hi Neil!
Thanks much for your help, array creation using devel-2 just works,
however, the array can't be assembled again after it's stopped:(
# mdadm --zero-superblock -e 1 /dev/sdb
# mdadm --zero-superblock -e 1 /dev/sdc
# /bin/rm -rf /bitmap
# mdadm -C /dev/md0 -e 1 --bitmap /bitmap -l 1 -n 2 /d
On Wednesday July 6, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi!
> I'm getting problems with raid1 creation using new superblock format.
> Kernel used is 2.6.12.2 (with drivers/md and include/linux/raid taken from
> 2.6.13-rc1 to have a support for bitmaps and bug correction of md
> failing when starting resync
Hi!
I'm getting problems with raid1 creation using new superblock format.
Kernel used is 2.6.12.2 (with drivers/md and include/linux/raid taken from
2.6.13-rc1 to have a support for bitmaps and bug correction of md
failing when starting resync), all compiled together.
For mdadm I tried both mdadm-
