H. Peter n wrote:
No hiccups, data losses, or missing functionality. At the end of the
whole ordeal, the filesystem (1 TB, 50% full) was still quite prisine,
and fsck confirmed this. I was quite pleased :)
I second this. I endured numerous kernel crashes and other lockup/forced restart issues
I am top posting since I am starting a new topic.
Don't get me wrong, I like and trust md, at least with kernel 2.4.
This is the first I knew about EVMS, the website makes it sound wonderfull!
http://evms.sourceforge.net/
Is EVMS better than md?
Is EVMS replacing md?
Any performance data
This is just a potentially interesting forwarded mail from the EVMS
mailing list to illustrate the kind of issues/responses to the raid5
resize questions...
David
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 03/01/2005 09:16:51 AM:
I read in the evms user guide that it should be possible but I can't
seem
to find
Mike Tran wrote on Monday 04 April 2005 12:28:
We (EVMS team) intended to support RAID6 last year. But as we all
remember RAID6 was not stable then. I may write a plugin to support
RAID6 soon.
Hi Mike,
In your view, is RAID6 now considered stable? How soon might you have an evms
plugin
Followup to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
By author:David Kewley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In newsgroup: linux.dev.raid
Mike Tran wrote on Monday 04 April 2005 12:28:
We (EVMS team) intended to support RAID6 last year. But as we all
remember RAID6 was not stable then. I may write a plugin to support
