Re: idle array consuming cpu ??!!

2008-01-23 Thread Neil Brown
On Tuesday January 22, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Neil Brown ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote on 21 January 2008 12:15: > >On Sunday January 20, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> A raid6 array with a spare and bitmap is idle: not mounted and with no > >> IO to it or any of its disks (obviously), as shown b

Re: idle array consuming cpu ??!!

2008-01-23 Thread Bill Davidsen
Carlos Carvalho wrote: Bill Davidsen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote on 22 January 2008 17:53: >Carlos Carvalho wrote: >> Neil Brown ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote on 21 January 2008 12:15: >> >On Sunday January 20, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> >> A raid6 array with a spare and bitmap is idle: not moun

Re: idle array consuming cpu ??!!

2008-01-22 Thread Carlos Carvalho
Bill Davidsen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote on 22 January 2008 17:53: >Carlos Carvalho wrote: >> Neil Brown ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote on 21 January 2008 12:15: >> >On Sunday January 20, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> >> A raid6 array with a spare and bitmap is idle: not mounted and with no >> >> I

Re: idle array consuming cpu ??!!

2008-01-22 Thread Bill Davidsen
Carlos Carvalho wrote: Neil Brown ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote on 21 January 2008 12:15: >On Sunday January 20, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> A raid6 array with a spare and bitmap is idle: not mounted and with no >> IO to it or any of its disks (obviously), as shown by iostat. However >> it's cons

Re: idle array consuming cpu ??!!

2008-01-21 Thread Carlos Carvalho
Neil Brown ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote on 21 January 2008 12:15: >On Sunday January 20, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> A raid6 array with a spare and bitmap is idle: not mounted and with no >> IO to it or any of its disks (obviously), as shown by iostat. However >> it's consuming cpu: since reboot i

Re: idle array consuming cpu ??!!

2008-01-20 Thread Carlos Carvalho
Neil Brown ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote on 21 January 2008 12:15: >On Sunday January 20, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> A raid6 array with a spare and bitmap is idle: not mounted and with no >> IO to it or any of its disks (obviously), as shown by iostat. However >> it's consuming cpu: since reboot i

Re: idle array consuming cpu ??!!

2008-01-20 Thread Neil Brown
On Sunday January 20, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > A raid6 array with a spare and bitmap is idle: not mounted and with no > IO to it or any of its disks (obviously), as shown by iostat. However > it's consuming cpu: since reboot it used about 11min in 24h, which is quite > a lot even for a busy array

idle array consuming cpu ??!!

2008-01-20 Thread Carlos Carvalho
A raid6 array with a spare and bitmap is idle: not mounted and with no IO to it or any of its disks (obviously), as shown by iostat. However it's consuming cpu: since reboot it used about 11min in 24h, which is quite a lot even for a busy array (the cpus are fast). The array was cleanly shutdown so