Re: intent-logging, not synchronizing written blocks?

On Wednesday November 9, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Neil Brown ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote on 10 November 2005 09:50: > >> Is intent-logging for raid5 already in mainline or only in -mm? I > >> looked for it in 2.6.14 and found nothing... > > > >raid5 is in 2.6.14. raid6 and raid10 should be in

Re: intent-logging, not synchronizing written blocks?

Neil Brown ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote on 10 November 2005 09:50: >> Is intent-logging for raid5 already in mainline or only in -mm? I >> looked for it in 2.6.14 and found nothing... > >raid5 is in 2.6.14. raid6 and raid10 should be in 2.6.16. >What did you look for? Some doc, or compilation o

Re: intent-logging, not synchronizing written blocks?

On Wednesday November 9, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi, > > Is intent-logging for raid5 already in mainline or only in -mm? I > looked for it in 2.6.14 and found nothing... raid5 is in 2.6.14. raid6 and raid10 should be in 2.6.16. What did you look for? > > It seems that intent-logging acceler

intent-logging, not synchronizing written blocks?

Hi, Is intent-logging for raid5 already in mainline or only in -mm? I looked for it in 2.6.14 and found nothing... It seems that intent-logging accelerates synchronization by skipping the blocks that have not changed since the array went out of sync. I'm not sure but if this is correct I thought