Re: spare group

2007-06-13 Thread Tomka Gergely
Neil Brown írta: On Tuesday June 12, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am very sorry, but it wont works with .9 superblocks also :( We missing something small, but important here. Before you start to code. mdadm was running in monitor mode, and reported a Fail. mdadm is the latest version, 2.6.2.

Re: spare group

2007-06-12 Thread Neil Brown
On Tuesday June 12, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: According to the source: * If an array has active raid spare == 0 spare_group !=NULL * Look for another array with spare 0 and active == raid and same spare_group * if found, choose a device and hotremove/hotadd This is not

Re: spare group

2007-06-12 Thread Tomka Gergely
/dev/sde1 1 8 811 active sync /dev/sdf1 2 002 removed 3 8 97- faulty spare /dev/sdg1 ARRAY /dev/md1 level=raid5 num-devices=3 spare-group=ubul UUID=815d6fc4:a55c2602:36458d87:119f8994 ARRAY /dev/md0

Re: spare group

2007-06-12 Thread Neil Brown
On Tuesday June 12, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am very sorry, but it wont works with .9 superblocks also :( We missing something small, but important here. Before you start to code. mdadm was running in monitor mode, and reported a Fail. mdadm is the latest version, 2.6.2. tg