On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 05:52:57PM +1100, Neil Brown wrote:
On Wednesday January 9, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd provide data dumps of --examine and friends but I'm in a situation
where transferring the data would be a right pain. I'll do it if need
be, though.
So, what can I do?
On Sun, 2007-12-30 at 10:58 -0700, dean gaudet wrote:
On Sat, 29 Dec 2007, Dan Williams wrote:
On Dec 29, 2007 1:58 PM, dean gaudet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 29 Dec 2007, Dan Williams wrote:
On Dec 29, 2007 9:48 AM, dean gaudet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hmm bummer,
I have a RAID5 (5+1spare) setup that works perfectly well until I
reboot. I have 6 drives (two different models) partitioned to give me 2
arrays, md0 and md1, that I use for /home and /var respectively.
When I reboot, the system assembles each array, but swaps out what was
the spare with one
(originally posted through gmane but after few hours I haven't seen it come
through hence the potential repost)
Ububtu 6.06
LSI Megaraid 150-4
what I am looking for is a bit of education about how to diagnose raid five
performance problems and whether or not I'm barking up the wrong tree with
On Wednesday January 9, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 2007-12-30 at 10:58 -0700, dean gaudet wrote:
i have evidence pointing to d89d87965dcbe6fe4f96a2a7e8421b3a75f634d1
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=d89d87965dcbe6fe4f96a2a7e8421b3a75f634d1
On Jan 9, 2008 5:09 PM, Neil Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wednesday January 9, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 2007-12-30 at 10:58 -0700, dean gaudet wrote:
i have evidence pointing to d89d87965dcbe6fe4f96a2a7e8421b3a75f634d1
On Wednesday January 9, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 9, 2008 5:09 PM, Neil Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wednesday January 9, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can you test it please?
This passes my failure case.
Thanks!
Does it seem reasonable?
What do you think about limiting
On Wed, 2008-01-09 at 20:57 -0700, Neil Brown wrote:
So I'm incline to leave it as do as much work as is available to be
done as that is simplest. But I can probably be talked out of it
with a convincing argument
Well, in an age of CFS and CFQ it smacks of 'unfairness'. But does that
On Tue, 8 Jan 2008, Bill Davidsen wrote:
Neil Brown wrote:
On Monday January 7, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Problem is not raid, or at least not obviously raid related. The problem
is that the whole disk, /dev/hdb is unavailable.
Maybe check /sys/block/hdb/holders ? lsof
