On Tue, 20 Oct 1998 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi all, and sorry for using this kind of bandwidth :)
>
> In my mail yesterday I indicated that RAID-5 was finally working well
> for me, with 2.0.35 pre15.
>
> Before taking the RAID in production, I wanted to stress-test it. So, I
> ran a tar a
Stephen C. Tweedie writes:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, 18 Oct 1998 15:55:35 +0200 (CEST), MOLNAR Ingo
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> > On Sun, 18 Oct 1998, Tod Detre wrote:
>
> >> in 2.1 kernels you can mak nfs a block device. raid can work with block
> >> devices so if you raid5 several nfs computers
Hi all, and sorry for using this kind of bandwidth :)
In my mail yesterday I indicated that RAID-5 was finally working well
for me, with 2.0.35 pre15.
Before taking the RAID in production, I wanted to stress-test it. So, I
ran a tar and two bonnie jobs.
The system locked up to some extent. I c
On Mon, 19 Oct 1998, Stephen C. Tweedie wrote:
> Ingo, this is actually a problem: on nbd raid1, we *really* want read
> balancing to prefer the local disk if possible!
aggreed. i'll add user-configurable per-disk priority, and probably a
dynamic scheme too.
-- mingo
