From: Dave Wreski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On 08-Nov-98 Eugene Blanchard wrote:
> If you need information on RAID0, RAID1 or RAID1 over RAID0 for kernels
> 2.0.30 to 2.0.35, please e-mail me and I will send you the information
> that I've worked out with the generous help of the linux-
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Stephen Costaras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Saturday, November 07, 1998 11:50 PM
Subject: Re: Improving RAID5 performance (what disks/configuration?)
>For random I/O, you want eac
On Sat, 7 Nov 1998, Dan Bethe wrote:
> On Sat, 7 Nov 1998, Stephen Costaras wrote:
>
> > I don't see how this would really help with general I/O performance,
> > the RAID code is in the kernel, plus with the RAID thread itself
> > taking less than 20% of the CPU (usually around 10%) I don't see
Hi Mike (and all),
Well, much has happened in the Linux world the past 6 months!
As such, with more credibility and viability behind it, I have had a
much easier time promoting and securing substantial projects for linux
database server applications. We have (at the moment) selected a DPT
14-ba
On 08-Nov-98 Eugene Blanchard wrote:
> If you need information on RAID0, RAID1 or RAID1 over RAID0 for kernels
> 2.0.30 to 2.0.35, please e-mail me and I will send you the information
> that I've worked out with the generous help of the linux-raid list. Its
> too large to send to the linux-raid l
And lo, Stephen Costaras saith unto me:
>
> Seeing as we're all using RAID here, someone might know how to eek
> better performance out of a I/O subsystem.
>
> I'm using a Dual PPro system (Tyan S1668) with 3 Mylex KT-958
> controllers. Each controller has 3 Seagate Barracuda ST15150W
> drives
