patch raid0145-19990108-2.0.36 doesn't compile!

1999-01-10 Thread perluca
Hi, Mingo your last release doesn't compile i get this: - after done make zImage without any problem . ld -m elf_i386 -m elf_i386 -r -o sr_mod.o sr.o sr_ioctl.o sr_ioctl.o(.data+0x0): multiple definition of 'kernel_version' sr.o(.data+0x0): first defined here make[2]: *** [sr_mod.o] E

Re: RAID5 recovering from a disk failure

1999-01-10 Thread Sang-yong Suh
Thus spoke Martin Bene ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): >>My problem is that I can't recover the original full config. >>No matter how I change the order of the raidtab, the disconnected- >>and-later-reconnected disk is not included in the raid config. >> >>The appended is my raidtab. The reconnected disk is

scsi-idle and raid?

1999-01-10 Thread Eugene Blanchard
Has anyone worked with the scsi-idle patch and raid0/raid1? I have a linux box with 4 old seagate drives in raid1 over raid0. Two striped pairs mirrored together. Unfortunately, they are in a computer/classroom setting and are not accessed often. They are quite noisy. I'm looking at using the scsi

Re: halp in appliyng raid patches to 2.2.0pre4

1999-01-10 Thread Hisaaki Shibata
Dir raiders; > i was trying to apply raid0145-19981215 to 2.2.0pre4 Now I am runnnig linux-2.2.0-pre6 + raid0145-19990108-2.2.0-pre5 on P6-200 SMP linux box with RAID5. I have no compile errors. pro:~# uname -a Linux pro 2.2.0-pre6 #2 SMP Sun Jan 10 14:03:42 JST 1999 i686 unknown pro:~# cat /

Re: Software Raid5 configuration

1999-01-10 Thread Theo Van Dinter
|raid0 configuration currently. I would like to do away with this |configuration, and setup a linux software raid. I would prefer to use a ok |stable 2.0.X kernel but will use a 2.1.x kernel if neccessary. I am shouldn't be a problem unless you need some of the 2.1.x (or now 2.2.0preX) features

Re: halp in appliyng raid patches to 2.2.0pre4

1999-01-10 Thread Eric
> > hello > i was trying to apply raid0145-19981215 to 2.2.0pre4 > I did the same to Pre5, same problem. Please fix this soon. Greetings, Eric.