OK, in addition to my last post, upon rebooting my system (which
had a raid1 device functioning flawlessly thru 2 hours of testing), I get
teh following messages at boot:
Starting up RAID devices.
raidadd(pid 37) used obsolete MD ioctl, upgrade your software to use new
ictls.
r
OK, so having thought I had everything working, mke2fs -c /dev/md0
on the setup I have (see last message) returns:
mke2fs 1.12, 9-Jul-98 for EXT2 FS 0.5b, 95/08/09
/dev/md0: Invalid argument passed to ext2 library while setting up superblock
Agggh...
Hi;
After playing with RAID setups unsuccessfully for quite a while, I
think I finally have a raid1 setup working. What I would like to ask is
if the participants of this list could 'peer-review' my setup before I
make it (the raid system) a production system for my organization.
MOLNAR Ingo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Jan 1999, Evgeny Stambulchik wrote:
>
> > Software: kernel 2.0.36, raidtools-0.42 (I've also tried
> > raidtools-19981214-0.90 with raid0145-19990108 patch, with practically
> > no performance improvement).
>
> > md0 : active raid0 sdb
On Sun, 24 Jan 1999, Evgeny Stambulchik wrote:
> Software: kernel 2.0.36, raidtools-0.42 (I've also tried
> raidtools-19981214-0.90 with raid0145-19990108 patch, with practically
> no performance improvement).
> md0 : active raid0 sdb3 sdc3 sdd3 3084288 blocks 256k chunks
Hello all,
I need a very fast device for reading/analyzing huge chunks of data, typically
hundreds of MB (which are created by a slow process, so write performance is not
really important for me). From what I've read in the HOWTO, RAID-1 with N disks
should give an N-fold increase in the read per
