Hello
We had two IBM 6.4G IDE HDD's in a raid0 combo, thus making a 12G ext2 partition. Just
yesterday one of
the drives died (it's making some very weird sounds ;( ) and I'm wandering if there's
any way of restoring the
data off the first haddrive which seems to be working ok still.
--
> In DAC960-2.0.0-beta4 patch:
> it insert `#define MAX_SECTORS 254' into
> /usr/src/linux/include/linux/blkdev.h
> and raid0145-19990128-2.0.36 patch:
> it insert `#define MAX_SECTORS 128' into same file.
>
Hi,
Although i don't use a RAID controller based on the DAC patch,
The DAC patch is ne
On Mon, 8 Mar 1999, Hiroki Minematu wrote:
> In DAC960-2.0.0-beta4 patch:
> it insert `#define MAX_SECTORS 254' into
> /usr/src/linux/include/linux/blkdev.h
> and raid0145-19990128-2.0.36 patch:
> it insert `#define MAX_SECTORS 128' into same file.
>
> Possibly, there are some wrong confusio
Dear raid masters,
Is there any experiments on merging raid0145-19990128-2.0.36 patch
and DAC960-2.0.0-beta4 patch? Now, I've tried it, and have any trouble
its strange behavor. On RHL5.2, I applied raid0145-19990128-2.0.36
patch, and it worked fine. And, I applied DAC960-2.0.0-beta4 patch,
it
> /sbin/mdadd -a
> Warning : no checksum field for /dev/md0
> /dev/md0: No such file or directory
>
> ./MAKEDEV: don't know how to make device "md0"
>
> Help!
You are using a very old version of the raidtools if you are using mdadd (get the
latest raid0145 patch and raidtools package from
ftp.ker
I couldn't read WINMAIL.DAT but I use RAID0 and EIDE drives (2.0.36
kernel):
[tim@asus]$ cat /etc/raidtab
raiddev /dev/md0
raid-level 0
nr-raid-disks 2
nr-spare-disks 0
chunk-size 16
device /dev/hdg7
raid-disk
