At 10:25 18.05.99 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
possibly yes. There has been a great deal of cleanup done in the latest
version to make the impact on the generic kernel as small as possible.
Currently stock 2.2.9 doesnt really work well with RAID1/RAID5 (reason yet
unknown, Doug Ledford is
What is needed is a "raidhotremove --DOIT!!" to allow you to remove an active
disk ... (people have said this should be possible in the kernel -- but
tricky. Sounds pretty simple to me, but I'm not an expert ...)
now that everything lives in the kernel, i dont see how that would be
Please,
Where can I get any document with reference to RAID?
Thanks,
Tenorio
begin:vcard
n:Neto;Jose Tenorio Bezerra
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
org:LIGHT INFOCON TECNOLOGIA S/A
version:2.1
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
title:Analista de Suporte
tel;fax:55-83-333-1528
tel;work:55-83-333-1904
I have an 11 disk RAID5 set working with the new RAID code.
Scott
On Sat, 22 May 1999, Dietmar Stein wrote:
Hi Tod
I do not see any mistake; from the theory of raid5 you should be able to
set a raid5
with 8 disks or more.
Maybe I am wrong.
Sorry that I can't help you further.
I'd like to say thanks to everyone who responded to my
questions about the raid patches for 2.2.9. It appears that the server was
down - also effecting the Linux-kernel list - late Sunday/early Monday. I
finally got all your responses!
Looks like I will search for the patch from Ingo in the
At 23:17 23.05.99 +0200, you wrote:
raid-1 also increases read performance. It can do reads just like raid0,
because both disks contain the same data. It doesn't read the same block
from both disks and compare, instead it reads like from a stripe set (raid0).
At least that's the theory. Your
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, May 21, 1999 at 06:13:12PM +0200, Dietmar Stein wrote:
Hi
...
Readperformance will only increase by using raid0 (stripe), but it will
not be twice times faster.
Not quite true.
Hm, I thought of the theory which is used for SMP machines; you got
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Monday, May 24, 1999 1:02 PM
Subject: Re: raid1 on ide decreases read performance
raid-1 also increases read performance. It can do reads just like raid0,
because both
Hi!
I just installed RedHat 6.0 (which contains kernel v2.2.5) on a dual Pentium
Pro machine.
The computer has a 2940UW SCSI controller with 3 external 9GB disks.
Each disk has a 130MB swap partition and a 8.6GB Linux partition.
The three Linux partitions are configured as a raid 5 device
The answer is still the same (May 1999).
Lance.
Scott Smyth wrote:
I would like to explore the requirements of expanding
RAID 0,4, and 5 levels from an existing configuration.
For example, if you have 3 disks in a RAID 5 configuration,
you currently cannot add a disk to the RAID 5
Hello all:
I'm looking for a Linux HARDWARE RAID solution that supports booting from
the RAID. The hardware I know about that supports this:
DPT
ICP Vortex
I just returned an DPT 2044UW controller and caching module, performance was
AWFUL. Before I buy a ICP Vortex controller, I wanted to see
I have linux-2.2.6 + raid-0145-2.2.6 patches running on an SMP Dual PIII-500 w/
512MB ram
2 Adaptec 2940U2W's w/ IBM 9.1 Gig 10,000RPM LVD drives
Current config
SCSI IDControler Card
0 scsi1
0 scsi0
1 scsi1
2
Fred Reimer wrote:
This is a two part message. First, I need to check to see if I'm on the
list..
Second, where can I get patches for the alpha raid tools that RedHat chose
to put in their version of the kernel that will work under 2.2.9? The
latest official alpha patches appear to be
Francesco Potorti` wrote:
Hi,
I remember having seen on this list a message saying that making a swap
file on a filesystem residing over a raid device was not possible/reliable
(because of a race condition in the kernel?).
Unfortunately, my own archive of the list only contains a
14 matches
Mail list logo
