Does anyone know how far ext3 is off? Also I heard SGI had
released thiercode for journaling? Is this to be adopted into
ext3?CheersRob
I had seen this same problem in a prior version and had emailed the
following comment to the list with no reply:
...
With linux 2.0.36 and patch raid0145-19990421-2.0.36 applied, if a disk is
looked at for autostart but rejected because it's superblock is out of
date, you can't raidhotadd or raid
On Thu, 22 Jul 1999, Andrew Doane wrote:
> > you can mirror RAID0 arrays no problem.
> I tried to use linear to combine two raid5 partitions. It died instantly
> with "got md request - not good".
yes - you cannot do it the other way around, yet. I'll fix RAID0 and
LINEAR to handle remaps corr
>
> On Thu, 22 Jul 1999, Christopher A. Gantz wrote:
>
> > Also was wondering what was the status of providing RAID 1 + 0
> > functionality in software for Linux.
>
> it works just fine:
>
> [root@moon /root]# cat /proc/mdstat
> Personalities : [linear] [raid0] [raid1] [raid5]
> read_ah
Hi everyone--
I have been on this list for a little while now, and I am wondering
what the concensus is on what is the most robust/stable setup for RAID under
RedHat 6.0/Kernel 2.2.5 (or a later kernel if it means better
performance/stability).
I am getting ready to set up a serv
On 2.0.37+raid990713 (recent), when I stop my raid1 device (using raidstop),
it refuses to 'raidstart' (I have to reboot to get /dev/md0 active again).
Is it a bug or a feature? :)
Here it is:
--
ego2:~# cat /proc/mdstat
Personalities : [raid1] [raid5]
read_ahead 1024 sectors
md0 : activ
On Thu, 22 Jul 1999, Christopher A. Gantz wrote:
> Also was wondering what was the status of providing RAID 1 + 0
> functionality in software for Linux.
it works just fine:
[root@moon /root]# cat /proc/mdstat
Personalities : [linear] [raid0] [raid1] [raid5]
read_ahead 1024 sectors
md2
New RAID-1 System with SuSe 6.1/kernel 2.2.10, 1 ide-hd as boot device,
and 2 9G SCSIs as RAID-1 devices.
escudo:~ # cat /etc/fstab
/dev/hda4 swap swapdefaults 0 0
/dev/hda1 / ext2defaults 1 1
/dev/hda2
On Thu, 22 Jul 1999, Mark Ferrell wrote:
> I could be off my rocker, but I believe the answer your looking for is the fact
> that Lilo cannot correctly use a raid for booting. Typically I would imagine you
> would settup / as the mirror, and perhaps make a /boot that's it's own non-raid
> partitio
I could be off my rocker, but I believe the answer your looking for is the fact
that Lilo cannot correctly use a raid for booting. Typically I would imagine
you
would settup / as the mirror, and perhaps make a /boot that's it's own non-raid
partition for kernel images and such, thusly lilo would
Hello Everyone,
First I'd like to apologize if this question has been asked before, however,
I am trying to determine the specific reason why mirroring of the root (/)
partition can not be done with software (i.e. host based) mirroring. I've
read (In an FAQ) that it has something to do with wha
On Wed, Jul 21, 1999 at 05:21:54PM -0700, D. Lance Robinson wrote:
> James,
>
> There are currently 128 possible SCSI disk device allocated in the
> device map--see linux/Documentation/devices.txt . Now, each of these
> supports partitions 1..15 (lower 4 bits) with 0 being the raw device,
> and
On Thu, 22 Jul 1999, Schackel, Fa. Integrata, ZRZ DA wrote:
> Thx for all your help. All works fine. I had to rebuild kernel
> and reboot with the new one.
the 'hard limit' for per-array disks is 12. Work is underway to raise this
limit. (the new code boots and works, but some migration issues
Hello,
Thx for all your help. All works fine. I had to rebuild kernel
and reboot with the new one.
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Yes. If you build RAID as a module then you won't have to reboot...
>
>
> > no I've not inreased the max num of disks (didn't even know).
> > Do I have to
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write:
>there's another problem with linux that hasn't been mentioned at the list:
>with ext2 the maximum filesize is 2 GByte. Maybe there's a patch out there
>but i don't think so because it is a design limitation.
Thats not quite correct. The maximum filesize
15 matches
Mail list logo
