David Teigland wrote:
This eliminates repetitious driver-specific code and provides a clean way
to make MD, LVM and Pool modular. MD devices can currently be used within
LVM, but this patch, in a general sense, imposes no limit on the number or
order in which volumes are built on one
Yes, i created my raid1 over an existing file-system.
My raidtab is exactly the sample w/o the sparedisk.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How did you create it? Did you upgrade from a previous version of md? How
does your /etc/raidtab look like? Did you create your raid1 over an existing
With 2.2.10 + a recent uniform ide patch, I don't have to do anything
with hdparm to get udma-66 working with a Promise Ultra66 card.
The kernel reports something like this at boot time:
Uniform Multi-Platform E-IDE driver Revision: 6.19
PIIX4: IDE controller on PCI bus 00 dev 39
I recently installed RH 6.0, and built several raid0 and 1 raid1
devices,
with this kernel. I then upgraded to RH's new kerenl : 2.2.5-15. I
have no
problems with this configuration.
[snip]
I thought I might need to do mkraid --upgrade, but the program reported
that
my arrays were OK
On Mon, 9 Aug 1999, Thomas James Mackie III wrote:
[NON-Text Body part not included]
This error really means: see syslog for more information.
I asume this is just a test setup, because using raid0 on two ide devices
on the same controller is not very useful, it will kill any performance
I recently installed RH 6.0, and built several raid0 and 1 raid1 devices,
with this kernel. I then upgraded to RH's new kerenl : 2.2.5-15. I have no
problems with this configuration.
2.2.5-15 dmesg (long, but see below, this is after an unsuccessful 2.2.11 boot)
(read) sda2's sb offset:
Has anyone got an idea how to combine the 2.2.10-ac9 patch and the
raid0145-19990724-2.2.10 patch?
I did not get it running... perhaps someone knows an answer.
Thank you
andreas
--
andreas gietl
dedicated server systems
fon +49 9402 2551
fax +49 9402 2604
mobile +49 171 60 70 008
[EMAIL
On Fri, Jul 30, 1999 at 11:57:12PM -0500, D. Carlos Knowlton wrote:
Alright, what's going on guys?!
I called Western Digital technical support to find out what I need to do to
get my U-ATA/66 drives to transfer anything near 66MB/s, (Mega"bytes", note
the capital 'B')like all the literature
First off, the rating was maximum burst-rate, not sustained. The tech
was wrong, it is Bytes, as in 66 Mega-bytes per second. However, UDMA
drives can not sustain that rate. Calculate the spin rate, surface feet
per minute per track, and bit density per track-inch, and you will find
that rate
I didn't try 4 drives. 19MB/s doesn't sound too impressive for 4
drives at raid5.
How are you measuring the performance?
I've found that reading /dev/md0 is quite a bit slower
than reading a file on a mounted filesystem on /dev/md0.
Well, true, I got 19MB/s when I did a "hdparm -t
10 matches
Mail list logo
