After editing the fs type on my raid partitions (thanks James Andreas),
the system saw the raid device during boot.
But it is only using one of the disk in the raid device. (Is mentioned
during boot)
Did mkraid again, some mount/umount raidstart/stop to test things
Seemed ok.
I've got rh6.0. I'm trying to implement RAID1.
I compiled the 2.2.10-4 kernel with the raid1 option. I installed the 0.90-4
rpm of raidtools. I'm trying to use the failed-disk option but it doesn't
appear to be recognized. I've been lurking on the list for a while so I know
there is a patch for
hello,
i posted this to comp.os.linux.misc before i found the list. sorry if
some people see it twice.. any help would be appreciated.
--
Jon Nathan
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.rupture.net/~jon/
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1999 13:15:46 -0400
From: Jon Nathan
ftp://ftp.de.kernel.org/pub/linux/daemons/raid/alpha/
raid0145-date-kernel-version.bz2 and the
raidtools-date-raid-version.tar.bz2
ftp://ftp.de.kernel.org/pub/linux/daemons/raid/alpha/raid0145-19990724-2.2.10.bz2
How did you create it? Did you upgrade from a previous version of md? How
does your /etc/raidtab look like? Did you create your raid1 over an existing
file-system?
Thomas
Hi. i am having trouble on fsck my raid1 array. Fsck says:
The filesystem size (according to the superblock) is 8787555
It's Byte, so 66 Megabytes/sec is correct.
But that's just the burst rate. If you look at the specs
for the disk drives, you'll see that they can't keep up with that rate.
I figure anything 10MB/s sustained is pretty good for todays drives.
Expect more in the future.
Jan Edler
NEC Research
That's not very good because raid whatever places in the last few bytes
its raid-superblock. When you created the raid, you wrote the super-block
over the last bytes of the filesystem.
Now it's corrupted.
When you want to create a raid over an existing ext2 filesystem you have
to resize the
I have sent tow requests to majordomo telling it to change my email addres
but it has refused me both times.
Can the owner of this list please change my email from
[EMAIL PROTECTED] to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks,
David
On Fri, 30 Jul 1999, D. Carlos Knowlton wrote:
Alright, what's going on guys?!
I called Western Digital technical support to find out what I need to do to
get my U-ATA/66 drives to transfer anything near 66MB/s, (Mega"bytes", note
the capital 'B')like all the literature and advertising and
Jakob Osterngaard wrote:
[snip]
Was 19MB/s from a RAID ?
If so, how many disks ? What RAID configuration ? How did you measure it
?
I'm running RAID level 5 on four WD Caviar 20.4GB U66 drives.
19MB/s is what I get when I do a "hdparm -t /dev/md0". I also tried cp'ing
a 1GB file to
I keep getting:
handling MD device /dev/md0
analyzing super-block
disk 0: /dev/sda1, 8883913kB, raid superblock at 8883840kB
disk 1: /dev/sdb1, 8883913kB, raid superblock at 8883840kB
disk 2: /dev/sdc1, 8883913kB, raid superblock at 8883840kB
disk 3: /dev/sdd1, 8883913kB, raid superblock at
disk 0: /dev/rd/c0d0p1, 88866800kB, raid superblock at 88866688kB
disk 1: /dev/rd/c0d1p1, 35547120kB, raid superblock at 35547008kB
disk 2: /dev/rd/c0d2p1, 35547120kB, raid superblock at 35547008kB
disk 3: /dev/rd/c0d3p1, 35547120kB, raid superblock at 35547008kB
disk 4: /dev/rd/c0d4p1,
Hi!
After applying the raid0145-19990724-2.2.10 Patch, I get:
martian:/usr/src/linux# make dep ; make clean
make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/linux-2.2.10/arch/i386/boot'
make[1]: Nothing to be done for `dep'.
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-2.2.10/arch/i386/boot'
scripts/mkdep
In my s/w raid5 over h/w raid0 testing, I had just completed
s/w raid5 over 4 h/w raid0's (via Mylex DAC1164P, 5 drives each),
recorded the bonnie results. After using Mylex's config util
(in a DOS reboot) and making the 20 drives into 10 raid0's with
2 drives each, I did the follow:
- killed
14 matches
Mail list logo
