question

1999-10-05 Thread Marcel Beerli
When I issue the mkraid /dev/md0 it complains about the ext2 filesystem. Am I supposed to use fdisk first? /Marcel - Marcel BeerliG e t S o f t w a r e [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.getsoftware.com Shareware Sales & Distribut

Re: Dream RAID System

1999-10-05 Thread Chris Mauritz
> From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 5 22:48:26 1999 > > Hi everyone-- > > I have a question for everyone on the list: What hardware would you use > for a RAID system? I want it to be as robust as possible. It does not need > to be all that fast (equiv. or better than UDMA33 would be nice).

planning the IDE channels

1999-10-05 Thread dirk
Okay, I've got (2) 6.4gb Quantum Fireball drives that I want to raid-root per the recent RedHat 6.1 conversation. I also have a crappy old 210mb WD drive that /boot was going to reside on. Now the question is this: Will the WD drive "drag" one of the Quantums down? And if so, enough to waarrant p

Re: How do I spin up a SCSI disk after being hot swapped?

1999-10-05 Thread Lance Robinson
OOPS! I copied the first echo line, but didn't edit it. > Lance Robinson wrote: > > > > You should first use: > > echo "scsi remove-single-device a b c d" >/proc/scsi/scsi > > then use: > > echo "scsi remove-single-device a b c d " >/proc/scsi/scsi The second echo should be add-sing

Dream RAID System

1999-10-05 Thread Bryan Batchelder
Hi everyone-- I have a question for everyone on the list: What hardware would you use for a RAID system? I want it to be as robust as possible. It does not need to be all that fast (equiv. or better than UDMA33 would be nice). I am concerned with failover mostly -- Hot swap and recons

Re: redhat 6.1 RAID: what's different - installs

1999-10-05 Thread Alvin Oga
hi ya... > > This is a feature of the new graphical installer. Creating raid > > partitions is not available if you are using the text mode installer. > > Is it available if you do a kickstart installation? I'd be interested in writing an installer/duplicator... - am tired of doing it the re

Re: redhat 6.1 RAID: what's different

1999-10-05 Thread Jakob Østergaard
On Tue, Oct 05, 1999 at 04:15:14PM -0700, Lawrence Dickson wrote: > I am solidly with Daniel on this. Why does no one ever use the fact that > a graphical interface can be put on top of a text mode interface (we have > multitasking don't we?) and thus kept equivalent instead of divergent? > It is

Re: networked RAID-1

1999-10-05 Thread Paul Jakma
GFS link: www.globalfilesystem.org -- Paul Jakma [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP5 key: http://www.clubi.ie/jakma/publickey.txt --- Fortune: In the Halls of Justice the only justice is in the halls. -- Lenny Bruce

Re: networked RAID-1

1999-10-05 Thread Paul Jakma
Re: Multi host access SCSI buses. GFS is what you guys want. Filesystem that will allow multiple access at the drive level. eg 2+ seperate hosts accessing a drive simultaneously. Seagate are co-operating to develop a SCSI standard for drive locking. (firmware updates available). Search for GFS o

Re: redhat 6.1 RAID: what's different

1999-10-05 Thread Jakob Østergaard
On Tue, Oct 05, 1999 at 10:30:23PM +0200, Daniel Roesen wrote: > > Creating raid partitions is not available if you are using the text mode > > installer. > > You're kidding, aren't you? Seems like RedHat is really trying to go the SuSE > way and become Windows... If you ever looked at the sourc

Re: redhat 6.1 RAID: what's different

1999-10-05 Thread Chris Garrigues
> From: Tom Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date:Tue, 5 Oct 1999 15:52:42 -0400 (EDT) > > This is a feature of the new graphical installer. Creating raid > partitions is not available if you are using the text mode installer. Is it available if you do a kickstart installation? Chris -- Chris

Re: redhat 6.1 RAID: what's different

1999-10-05 Thread Lawrence Dickson
I am solidly with Daniel on this. Why does no one ever use the fact that a graphical interface can be put on top of a text mode interface (we have multitasking don't we?) and thus kept equivalent instead of divergent? It is self-documenting too at the developer level. GUI means "Grossly Unpredi

Re: redhat 6.1 RAID: what's different

1999-10-05 Thread joseph_schofield
Does this mean that kickstart scripts don't work, or can I use them with the new graphical installer? On Tue, Oct 05, 1999 at 10:48:51PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > On Tue, 5 Oct 1999, Daniel Roesen wrote: > > > > Creating raid partitions is not available if you are using the text mode > > >

Re: redhat 6.1 RAID: what's different

1999-10-05 Thread Ingo Molnar
On Tue, 5 Oct 1999, Daniel Roesen wrote: > > Creating raid partitions is not available if you are using the text mode > > installer. > > You're kidding, aren't you? Seems like RedHat is really trying to go the SuSE > way and become Windows... well, the installer is GPL, so you are certainly we

Re: redhat 6.1 RAID: what's different

1999-10-05 Thread Daniel Roesen
> Creating raid partitions is not available if you are using the text mode > installer. You're kidding, aren't you? Seems like RedHat is really trying to go the SuSE way and become Windows... Regards, Daniel

Re: redhat 6.1 RAID: what's different

1999-10-05 Thread Tom Jones
Hi, Yes. You can install root to a raid device during the install. However you will still need to have a /boot that is not on the raid device. This is a feature of the new graphical installer. Creating raid partitions is not available if you are using the text mode installer. --

Re: redhat 6.1 RAID: what's different

1999-10-05 Thread Laszlo Vecsey
does the redhat 6.1 installation allow for root mounted raid? It would be nice to just be able to insert a couple boot disks, and install straight from nfs/ftp or cdrom, and not have to tweak anything manually. On Tue, 5 Oct 1999, Drenning Bruce wrote: > to quote from the press release, 6.1 has

redhat 6.1 RAID: what's different

1999-10-05 Thread Drenning Bruce
to quote from the press release, 6.1 has "seamless integration of software RAID configurations to safeguard critical data and application availability". RAID-wise, is anything different from 6.0 except the version of the patches/tools included?

Re: networked RAID-1

1999-10-05 Thread James Manning
[ Tuesday, October 5, 1999 ] Marc Mutz wrote: > That will do _nothing_ for you, because: > > 1.) you can only mount it r/w on exactly one machine. > 2.) even if 1) is ok for you, you cannot even mount the array ro on the > other machines, because of Linux' disk caching. Although I have to admit

Re: networked RAID-1

1999-10-05 Thread Marc Mutz
Tom Kunz wrote: > > Linux-based software alternative to the super-expensive external RAID > towers that have multiple independent SCSI buses. They run for $10k > each, and you can connect multiple machines into them, which will all > mount the array simultaneously. Any node can go down at any

Re: How do I spin up a SCSI disk after being hot swapped?

1999-10-05 Thread Tomas Fasth
Lance Robinson wrote: > > You should first use: > echo "scsi remove-single-device a b c d" >/proc/scsi/scsi > then use: > echo "scsi remove-single-device a b c d " >/proc/scsi/scsi I have no problem with remove. My problem is about getting my disk to spin up again after insertion. But

RE: networked RAID-1

1999-10-05 Thread Roeland M.J. Meyer
A few applications for some of this thought. 1) I have long lusted after something Like MC/ServiceGuard on Linux. My favorite setup is one EMC RAID box being shared by two HP-UX systems, inter-connected with MC\ServiceGuard. Running thin-server Oracle makes this a sweet deal. Two of these with Or