-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
I "recently" installed stock RedHat 6.1 and configured with root RAID1
and everything else RAID5. I have 4 U2 LVD SCSI drives on two
controllers. RedHat plays games with the partition layouts when I try
to use its graphical tool, so I ended up partitioning the
In ka.lists.linux.raid, you wrote:
>Ingo Molnar wrote:
>> let me know if you still have any problem. The problem outlined by
>> Andrea's patch (which reverses a patch of mine) is solved as well.
>
>O.K. I'm a little confused now. Do I need to install the RAID patch
>raid0145-19990824-2.2.11 befor
Chris Picton wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> Is there a raid patch which applies cleanly to a 2.2.14 kernel?
>
http.//www.redhat.com/~mingo/raid-2.2.14-B1
Marc
--
Marc Mutz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>http://marc.mutz.com/Encryption-HOWTO/
University of Bielefeld, Dep. of Mathematics / Dep. of Physics
P
On Thu, Jan 06, 2000 at 10:24:40AM +0200, Chris Picton wrote:
> Hi
>
> Is there a raid patch which applies cleanly to a 2.2.14 kernel?
>
> I looked at kernel.org, but only see one for 2.2.11, which doesnt patch
> cleanly
you should read the list :))
http://www.redhat.com/~mingo/raid-2.2.14-B1
Ingo,
On Thu, 6 Jan 2000 14:14:07 +0100 (CET), Ingo Molnar wrote:
>> I just wanted to warn everybody not to use raid0145-19990824-2.2.11
>> together with kernel 2.2.14: at least in my configuration (two IDE
>> drives with RAID-1, root on /dev/mdx) the kernel panics with "B_FREE
>> inserted into
On Thu, 6 Jan 2000, Gregory Leblanc wrote:
> > this should be fixed in:
> >
> > http://www.redhat.com/~mingo/raid-2.2.14-B1
> >
> > let me know if you still have any problem. The problem outlined by
> > Andrea's patch (which reverses a patch of mine) is solved as well.
>
> O.K. I'm a
Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> On Wed, 5 Jan 2000, Robert Dahlem wrote:
>
> > I just wanted to warn everybody not to use raid0145-19990824-2.2.11
> > together with kernel 2.2.14: at least in my configuration (two IDE
> > drives with RAID-1, root on /dev/mdx) the kernel panics with "B_FREE
> > inserted i
On Wed, 5 Jan 2000, Sylvain BARTHELEMY wrote:
> is there a way to remove a RAID-1, or to convert the array to an standard
> ext2fs, without erasing all the files on the disk ? I would like to keep all
> the files without having to do an entire restore of a previous backup which
> takes a very lon
On Thu, 6 Jan 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I am trying to build a raid0 array with 2 500 MB SCSI disks, using 2.3.36.
2.3.36 is broken wrt. RAID0 (even old RAID0 is broken). The new 2.3 RAID
patch i'm working on for 2.3.36 still has some instabilities in RAID1, but
RAID0 is rock solid. Will
On Wed, 5 Jan 2000, Robert Dahlem wrote:
> I just wanted to warn everybody not to use raid0145-19990824-2.2.11
> together with kernel 2.2.14: at least in my configuration (two IDE
> drives with RAID-1, root on /dev/mdx) the kernel panics with "B_FREE
> inserted into queues" at boot time.
this s
Hello *,
I am trying to build a raid0 array with 2 500 MB SCSI disks, using 2.3.36.
I've repartitioned, made a raiddev (raid0.conf basically, with changed
disks of course), and tried mkraid /dev/md0. This doesn't work (it says
it's aborted, and it does so during an ioctl(SET_ARRAY_INFO). I looked
Hello everybody,
many thanks for your answers for the Raidkernel.
My system is now running with the new kernel - thanks !
ciao
Sebastian
Hi
Is there a raid patch which applies cleanly to a 2.2.14 kernel?
I looked at kernel.org, but only see one for 2.2.11, which doesnt patch
cleanly
Thanks
--
Chris Picton
Usko Communications Systems Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
13 matches
Mail list logo
