> I do not know about performance, but if you build raid array using
> masters and slaves on same channel, it will lack redudancy because
> of if master dies, it will take slave with it ? So raid1 or raid5
> using masters AND slaves is totally unwise?
>
I can only speak from experience. I have
>On Mon, Jan 17, 2000 at 12:57:43PM +0100, KS wrote:
>> Hi there,
>> We are currently running RAID1 on some of our servers. We have thre ext2
>> filesystem. However we are considering seting up some test server to check how
>> much using ReiserFS would improve the speed.
>>
>> On their pages the
On Mon, Jan 17, 2000 at 12:57:43PM +0100, KS wrote:
> Hi there,
> We are currently running RAID1 on some of our servers. We have thre ext2
> filesystem. However we are considering seting up some test server to check how
> much using ReiserFS would improve the speed.
>
> On their pages they say t
On Fri, 14 Jan 2000, Keith Underwood wrote:
> I also experimented with the master/slave setup, and my recollection is
> also that it was worse than half the performance of the master only setup.
>
> Keith
>
I do not know about performance, but if you build raid array using
masters and slaves
On Tue, 11 Jan 2000, Thomas Waldmann wrote:
> > Cable length is not so much a pain as the number of cables. Of course with
> > scsi you want multiple channels anyway for performance, so the situation
> > is very similar to ide. A cable mess.
>
> Well, it is at least only a half / third / ... o
On Fri, 14 Jan 2000, James Manning wrote:
> [ Friday, January 14, 2000 ] jesse nelson wrote:
> > I had the same problem the default kernel is not patched on 6.0 or 6.1
> > installs although they include the 0.90 tools. I think the up2date RPM's are
> > though. I just moved to Mandrake 7.Beta an
I may be wrong, but it is my understanding that the 'Halt on errors' in the
system BIOS is for while the system is coming up (when the BIOS is coming
up). These are errors like when you have no video card, no keyboard, or
harddrive errors). Setting 'halt on errors' to 'none' will usuallly allow
Hello.
Can anyone tell me if there will be support for the ADAPTEC AAA-131U2
controller ?
Thanks
__
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
On Sun, 16 Jan 2000, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> here is the first alpha version of the '2.4 RAID merge' patch against
> pre4-2.3.40:
>
> http://www.redhat.com/~mingo/ibc-ext2-raid-2.3.40-N1
>
Doesn't work for me. When booting system locks up with the following output:
ll_rw_block: Tryi
Hi there,
We are currently running RAID1 on some of our servers. We have thre ext2
filesystem. However we are considering seting up some test server to check how
much using ReiserFS would improve the speed.
On their pages they say that their filesystem works with RAID1 , but not with
RAID5. Anot
here is the first alpha version of the '2.4 RAID merge' patch against
pre4-2.3.40:
http://www.redhat.com/~mingo/ibc-ext2-raid-2.3.40-N1
which implements three more or less independent (but related) features:
- Integrated Buffer-Cache
- improved new-style RAID merged in
Eric Enockson wrote:
>
> hello, I have an external raid scsi device with
> a loose cable. It would come loose and things would freeze
> up on the machine, and then i would push it back in and
> the system would come back. Now however i get somewhat
> random operating system crashes. At
Hello everybody,
due to the fact that I'm new in the group, let me put a propably silly
question:
- Will raidtools 0.90 work any longer with Kernel 2.3.x?
- Are there propably some whitepapers of the authors somewhere?
Thank you for your answers.
Best regards
Wolfgang Magin
13 matches
Mail list logo
