At 14:31 19-1-00 +0200, Janne Himanka wrote:
>We have a dual PII with 8 4.3GB Cheetahs in two uw scsi channels. I
>used to run it with kernel 2.2.3, a root disk, spare disk and a raid5
>partition composed of 6 disks. The raid5 partition worked otherwise
>well, but within 6 months it lost its super
Title: RE: Possible memory leak + setup questions
According Ingo Molnar the raid maintainer:
here is the first alpha version of the '2.4 RAID merge' patch against
pre4-2.3.40:
http://www.redhat.com/~mingo/ibc-ext2-raid-2.3.40-N1
And for 2.2.14 here is the patch.
http://w
We have a dual PII with 8 4.3GB Cheetahs in two uw scsi channels. I
used to run it with kernel 2.2.3, a root disk, spare disk and a raid5
partition composed of 6 disks. The raid5 partition worked otherwise
well, but within 6 months it lost its superblock three times, once in
a UPS failure, twice f
Hi Michael,
At 08:39 18.01.00 -0800, Michael wrote:
>I presently have an ide raid 5 system that uses master/slave disks
>that I'm upgrading to controller/disk. Reading through the various
>raid threads leads me to believe that changing the position of a disk
>in the array can cause problems and/o
Hello everybody.
I'm using Raid1 with kernel 2.2.13. But I need to install kernel 2.0.34 now.
Where can I get the raid patch for kernel 2.0.34?
Thanks in advance.
[ Wednesday, January 19, 2000 ] Innovation Strategies SL wrote:
> I'm using Raid1 with kernel 2.2.13. But I need to install kernel 2.0.34 now.
> Where can I get the raid patch for kernel 2.0.34?
I only see raid patches going back to 2.0.35 at
kernel.org/pub/linux/daemons/raid/alpha/
You might
[ Tuesday, January 18, 2000 ] KS wrote:
> We recently had an ups failure and some of our servers have crashed. When
> reviewing the logs on the maschines I have spotted messages like:
>
> kernel: md: serializing resync, md0 has overlapping physical units with md1!
> ..
> kernel: md: serializing r
Rainer Mager wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I have a motley set of disks that I'm hoping to use more effeciently via
> raid. Any tips on this would be greatly appreciated.
>
> Right now I have:
>
> 2 X 2 Gig SCSI
> 1 X 3 Gig SCSI
> 1 X 7 Gig SCSI
> 1 X 4.5 Gig UW SCSI 2
> 1 X 20 Gig IDE
>
> I don
[ Monday, January 17, 2000 ] Holger Kiehl wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Jan 2000, James Manning wrote:
> > Just for clarification, the default (stock) RH 6.x *is* patched
> > for 0.90 RAID (the 6.1 installer even allows you to install to a
> > s/w raid1!)
>
> And raid0 or raid5, only /boot needs to be raid
[ Sunday, January 16, 2000 ] David Corbin wrote:
> My real question, is how do strip-size, Oracle block size, and ext2 file
> system block size interact, and what should they be to get the most
> efficient database? (The database, while not large, is used for both
> operations and "warehousing",
10 matches
Mail list logo
