[Matthew Burke]
> On Sun, 28 May 2000, James Manning wrote:
> > [Matthew Burke]
> > > e2fsck 1.18, 11-nov-1999 for EXT2 FS 0.5b, 95/08/09
> > > e2fsck: Attempt to read block from filesystem resulted in short read while
> > > trying to open /dev/md1
> > > Could this be a zero-length partition?
>
>
[Matthew Burke]
> e2fsck 1.18, 11-nov-1999 for EXT2 FS 0.5b, 95/08/09
> e2fsck: Attempt to read block from filesystem resulted in short read while
> trying to open /dev/md1
> Could this be a zero-length partition?
>
> /dev/md1 is not mounted, but it is properly set up in /etc/raidtab
>
> raidsta
Hello,
I have just set up a new web server with two drives each configured with
four identical partitions. The three "non-swap" partitions are all set up
as RAID level 1 mirrors. Everything is up and running fine.
md0 = /
md1 = /home
md2 = /usr
I physically removed each of the drives at diffe
Hi. I'm in URGENT need of some help.
After changing motherboards in one of my boxes to a Via VB601, I forgot to
disable the UDMA setting in the bios. This is needed because this mobo,
my Seagate 6.5Gb drives, and UDMA don't mix.
The result was the kernel segfaulted/panicked after fscking /dev
[Ion Badulescu]
> In article
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you
>wrote:
>
> > I am having trouble using Linux RAID on a Sun Ultra1 running
> > 2.2.15.
>
> You need an additional patch, just plain vanilla 2.2.15 + raid-0.90 won't
> do on a sparc. Red Hat have it in their 2.2.14-12 source rpm, but I'm
Why didn't this get integrated generically into the 2.2.15 patch? It's been
a known "feature" for a while.
Greg
> -Original Message-
> From: Ion Badulescu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Sunday, May 28, 2000 3:18 PM
> To: Gustav
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Problems
In article
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> I am having trouble using Linux RAID on a Sun Ultra1 running
> 2.2.15.
You need an additional patch, just plain vanilla 2.2.15 + raid-0.90 won't
do on a sparc. Red Hat have it in their 2.2.14-12 source rpm, but I'm
attaching it here, for convenie
Hello,
I am having trouble using Linux RAID on a Sun Ultra1 running
2.2.15. I have two identical SCSI disks, partitioned the same, and am
trying to set up a RAID-1 mirror between two slices. Both slices are
currently unused and unomunted. I have compiled all the various RAID
optio
[Jakob Østergaard]
> > Set up a raidtab entry **WITH GREAT CARE** specifying the minimal set as
> > above, with the oldest partitions `raid-failed'. Now create the device.
> > This will write a new set of consistent PSBs.
>
> Correct.
s/raid-failed/failed-disk/ as per section 6.1
http://www.lin
I managed to set up 8 raid1 mirrors and everything is working fine.
The raid-Howto was a great help for me but I am missing some hints what to
do in case of
- a disk of my raid1 mirror fails
- there is a power failure and the mirrors may be in an inconsistent
state.
There is a section "Err
On Sun, 28 May 2000, Benjamin Close wrote:
> Hi All,
> I have a raid 0 setup used primarly for speed (I know there is no
> redundancy - I don't need it). However, I can't seem to get it
> autodetecting the raid array at startup with the 2.3 or 2.4 kernels. Is
> there something I'm missing?
On Sat, 27 May 2000, Piete Brooks wrote:
> > I had a failure where 2 of the disks out of 4 is marked bad.
> < (by superblock update time inconsistency) Do i have chance to recover
> > from this ? thanx in advance..
>
> This should be in the FAQ ...
Section 6.1 in the HOWTO describes this s
Hi All,
I have a raid 0 setup used primarly for speed (I know there is no
redundancy - I don't need it). However, I can't seem to get it
autodetecting the raid array at startup with the 2.3 or 2.4 kernels. Is
there something I'm missing?
Also where would I find suitable raid tools to manu
13 matches
Mail list logo
