Re: computer reset - what does this mean for raid1 ?

2000-02-07 Thread Chris Cogdon
iginal master, even though neither drive is 'good'. Ie... you'll /still/ get file system errors. If you want to protect yourself against system failures, then you'll probably want to couple raid with a transaction filesystem like Rieser. (Dont

Re: RAID 0 set broken on RH 6.0

2000-02-07 Thread Chris Cogdon
back to 0 or 1, as appropriate. Still... its worth a check. ("`-/")_.-'"``-._Ch'marr, a.k.a. . . `; -._)-;-,_`) Chris Cogdon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (v_,)' _ )`-.\ ``-' _.- _..-_/ / ((.' FC1.3: FFH3cmA+>++C++D++H++M++P++R++T+

Re: RAID 0 set broken on RH 6.0

2000-02-07 Thread Chris Cogdon
ill trash it once and forever. But... i'd be very worried why windows trashed the info in the first place. What partition types are your raid volumes set to ? ("`-/")_.-'"``-._Ch'marr, a.k.a. . . `; -._)-;-,_`) Chris Cogdon <[EMAIL PROT

Re: "bad md_map in ll_rw_block" when mounting raid 5 md

2000-02-02 Thread Chris Cogdon
It should be possible. I've successfully done this with raid 1 outside the redhat-6.1 install procedure, and with raid 1 AND raid 5 within the install procedure. (Ie, resynch during mke2fs, mount and copy stuff in :) ("`-/")_.-'"``-._ Ch'marr, a.k.a. .

Re: cleaning partition

2000-02-02 Thread Chris Cogdon
("`-/")_.-'"``-._ Ch'marr, a.k.a. . . `; -._)-;-,_`) Chris Cogdon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (v_,)' _ )`-.\ ``-' _.- _..-_/ / ((.' FC1.3: FFH3cmA+>++C++D++H++M++P++R++T+++WZ++Sm++ ((,.-' ((,/ fL RLCT acl+++d++e+f+++h++ijp-sm++

Turning non-raid system into raid.

2000-02-01 Thread Chris Cogdon
tried what I've done with any success ? ("`-/")_.-'"``-._ Ch'marr, a.k.a. . . `; -._)-;-,_`) Chris Cogdon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (v_,)' _ )`-.\ ``-' _.- _..-_/ / ((.' FC1.3: FFH3cmA+>++C++D++H++M++P++R++T+++WZ++Sm++ ((,.-' ((,/ fL RLCT acl+++d++e+f+++h++ijp-sm++