Re: performance limitations of linux raid

2000-04-25 Thread Daniel Roesen
On Tue, Apr 25, 2000 at 11:38:59PM +0100, Paul Jakma wrote: > > Clue: this is the way every RAID controller I know of works these days. > what??? Do you know what are you are talking about? Yep, I think so. I think I misunderstood you ("getting called by BIOS"). > a REAL raid contr

Re: performance limitations of linux raid

2000-04-25 Thread Daniel Roesen
On Tue, Apr 25, 2000 at 10:28:46PM +0100, Paul Jakma wrote: > Clue: the Promise IDE RAID controller is NOT a hardware RAID > controller. > > Promise IDE RAID == Software RAID where the software is written by > Promise and sitting on the ROM on the Promise card getting called by > the BIOS. Clue:

Re: redhat 6.1 RAID: what's different

1999-10-06 Thread Daniel Roesen
> Oh, please do tell why a graphical installer is a bad thing... especially > if it allows installation to a software RAID array. I have no problem with a GUI installer. I have a problem with having SERVER features only in GUI installer. A text-mode installer should be the reference. What woul

Re: redhat 6.1 RAID: what's different

1999-10-05 Thread Daniel Roesen
> Creating raid partitions is not available if you are using the text mode > installer. You're kidding, aren't you? Seems like RedHat is really trying to go the SuSE way and become Windows... Regards, Daniel