Benno,
On Fri, 07 Jan 2000 13:07:16 +0100, Benno Senoner wrote:
>I was wondering if this procedure (swapping on Raid1 + waiting for the resync),
>is safe on an IDE only system ?
>I don't need hot-swapping, the only thing I need is that if one disk dies,
>swapping will not take down the disk (ha
Ingo,
On Thu, 6 Jan 2000 14:14:07 +0100 (CET), Ingo Molnar wrote:
>> I just wanted to warn everybody not to use raid0145-19990824-2.2.11
>> together with kernel 2.2.14: at least in my configuration (two IDE
>> drives with RAID-1, root on /dev/mdx) the kernel panics with "B_FREE
>> inserted into
Hi,
I just wanted to warn everybody not to use raid0145-19990824-2.2.11 together with
kernel
2.2.14: at least in my configuration (two IDE drives with RAID-1, root on /dev/mdx)
the
kernel panics with "B_FREE inserted into queues" at boot time.
This seems to be some kind of a known problem, h
Chris,
On Fri, 26 Nov 1999 21:40:37 +0100, KS wrote:
>We just had some memory added in our server that is on some remote location.
>The guy also switched the disks that were in the raid1.
>He connected them to wrong cables, when he realised that sth is wrong,
>he connected them like before and a
David,
On Fri, 26 Nov 1999 03:03:35 -0800, David Cunningham wrote:
>Here's the situation. I've read the Howto. I've got 2 EIDE disks running
>RAID-1 under Redhat 6.0. The partition types are fd, the kernel option for
>autodetecting RAID is set, and md0 was built with persistent superblock.
>H
James,
On Fri, 26 Nov 1999 08:26:19 -0800 (PST), Mr. James W. Laferriere wrote:
> I vote for maintaining the Doc's , [...]
And do you volunteer to? :-)
Regards,
Robert
Stephen,
On Tue, 16 Nov 1999 16:05:19 -0800 (PST), Stephen Walton wrote:
>Well I'm a new convert to software RAID on Linux. The system I'm
>presently using is a P-150 with Adaptec 2940 SCSI controller, single SCSI
>hard disk which is the boot drive, and a new pair of Western Digital
>Caviar 20.
Luis,
On Wed, 17 Nov 1999 11:00:43 -0500 (EST), Luis Costabile wrote:
>Thanks Robert. I'm now able to boot from the boot partition of the
>second drive.
Well, that's what we wanted. :-)
>One question, where do you find out that sdb is supposed to be bios=0x80
> what about sda ?
sdb becom
Luis,
On Mon, 15 Nov 1999 12:49:07 -0500 (EST), Luis Costabile wrote:
>Hello, I installed root as a mirrored volume. I have two SCSI disks only
>in the system. According to the HOWTO it's suggested to have /boot reside
>on a separate partition on each disk. I installed the kernels and other
Jakob,
On Wed, 10 Nov 1999 19:55:56 +0100, Jakob stergaard wrote:
>After a change you can mkraid the array again, and if you have an ext2
>filesystem on it, you can probably use ext2resize to resize that to fit
>the new size of the array. Note however, that ext2resize only supports
>*growing*
Matt,
On Wed, 10 Nov 1999 11:18:37 -0500, Matt Kimmel wrote:
>I am running a RAID-1 mirror set of two disks on our Linux server here. A couple of
>weeks ago, one of the mirrors went bad. While waiting for a replacement, I ran the
>mirror with a single drive, which worked fine. However, now
Michel,
On Thu, 18 Nov 1999 11:00:36 -0500, Michel Pelletier wrote:
>> >> > physical? The other two partions on the same drive work
>> dandy with
>> >> > their RAID, it looks like just this one partition on the
>> >> drive is bad.
>> >> > How, in a nutshell, do I fix this sucker?
>> >> >
>>
Michel,
On Thu, 18 Nov 1999 10:24:15 -0500, Michel Pelletier wrote:
>> > physical? The other two partions on the same drive work dandy with
>> > their RAID, it looks like just this one partition on the
>> drive is bad.
>> > How, in a nutshell, do I fix this sucker?
>> >
>> try raidhotremove /
13 matches
Mail list logo
