Handling bad blocks in raid5.

1999-09-09 Thread Sang-yong Suh
Will some one explain how raid5 handles bad blocks? -- sysuh

Re: e2fsck not correcting RAID-5 recovered filesystem

1999-09-08 Thread Sang-yong Suh
mingo, Thank you very much for your help. I now recovered almost all data. No need to recreate the raid array, or the ext2 filesystem. The program, e2fsck, is good. It recovered the filesystem successfully. I answered "no" on its question: Clone duplicate/bad blocks? No

Re: e2fsck not correcting RAID-5 recovered filesystem

1999-09-07 Thread Sang-yong Suh
On Tue, Sep 07, 1999 at 06:29:21PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > On Wed, 8 Sep 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > I have the exactly same problem. My startup message was as follows: > > > > Sep 7 12:28:41 yfs kernel: md: kicking non-fresh sdc1 from array! > > Sep 7 12:28:41 yfs ke

Re: RAID5 recovering from a disk failure

1999-01-10 Thread Sang-yong Suh
Thus spoke Martin Bene ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): >>My problem is that I can't recover the original full config. >>No matter how I change the order of the raidtab, the disconnected- >>and-later-reconnected disk is not included in the raid config. >> >>The appended is my raidtab. The reconnected disk is

RAID5 recovering from a disk failure

1999-01-09 Thread Sang-yong Suh
As described in the RAID5.HOWTO, I disconnected one of the SCSI disks. The raid runs Ok after the rebooting. My problem is that I can't recover the original full config. No matter how I change the order of the raidtab, the disconnected- and-later-reconnected disk is not included in the raid confi