e? Does the -B2 patch fix any significant problems in the -A0
> patch?
The -A and -B tags are internal things of Ingo and can safely be ignored.
Regards,
bert hubert
--
| http://www.rent-a-nerd.nl
|
On Sun, Jul 30, 2000 at 10:28:50AM +0200, Holger Kiehl wrote:
> Hello
>
> I gave 2.4.0-test5 a try but am very disapointed with the results:
>
> ---Sequential Output ---Sequential Input-- --Random--
> -Per Char- --Block--- -Rewrite-- -Per Char- --Block
On Tue, Jun 13, 2000 at 04:51:46AM +1000, bug1 wrote:
> Maybe im missing something here, why arent reads just as fast as writes?
I note the same on a 2 way IDE RAID-1 device, with both disks on a separate
bus.
Regards,
bert hubert
--
| http://www.ren
- Forwarded message from Greg Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2000 10:51:00 -0500 (CDT)
From: Greg Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: VM: killing...
To: unlisted-recipients: ;(no To-header on input)
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm getting this problem on a stock RedHat 6.2 (
Hi,
I'm one of the authors of the Logical Volume Management HOWTO
(http://ds9a.nl), which will also touch lightly on RAID interoperation.
I am looking for a working archive of this list. I would like to find any
hints on the progress of the big 2.3 merge.
Regards,
bert h
