RE: 2.2.0pre8 and raid0145-19990108-2.2.0-pre5

1999-01-22 Thread paolo furieri
On Thu, 21 Jan 1999, David B. Rees wrote: > > patching file `linux/fs/buffer.c' > > Hunk #5 succeeded at 631 (offset -12 lines). > > Hunk #7 succeeded at 665 (offset -12 lines). > > Hunk #9 FAILED at 923. > > > > The reason it's not compiling for you is because Hunk #9 Failed. You'll have to >

Re: 2.2.0pre8 and raid0145-19990108-2.2.0-pre5

1999-01-22 Thread Eric Ladner
Luca Berra wrote: > > > P.S. Can someone direct me to the devfs patches? > http://www.antf.csiro.au/~rgooch/ > but it is NOT compatible with raid patches (well, until i find some time > to release another raid+devfs patch) > I think you meant atnf not antf. Specifically: ftp://ftp.atnf.csiro.

RE: 2.2.0pre8 and raid0145-19990108-2.2.0-pre5

1999-01-21 Thread David B. Rees
On 21-Jan-99 Danny Yee wrote: > When I apply raid0145-19990108-2.2.0-pre5 to a vanilla linux-2.2.0-pre8 > tree, the patch works with just one error message > > patching file `linux/fs/buffer.c' > Hunk #5 succeeded at 631 (offset -12 lines). > Hunk #7 succeeded at 665 (offset -12 lines). > Hunk #9

Re: 2.2.0pre8 and raid0145-19990108-2.2.0-pre5

1999-01-21 Thread Luca Berra
On Thu, Jan 21, 1999 at 03:38:37PM +1100, Danny Yee wrote: > When I apply raid0145-19990108-2.2.0-pre5 to a vanilla linux-2.2.0-pre8 > tree, the patch works with just one error message > > patching file `linux/fs/buffer.c' > Hunk #5 succeeded at 631 (offset -12 lines). > Hunk #7 succeeded at 665

2.2.0pre8 and raid0145-19990108-2.2.0-pre5

1999-01-21 Thread Danny Yee
When I apply raid0145-19990108-2.2.0-pre5 to a vanilla linux-2.2.0-pre8 tree, the patch works with just one error message patching file `linux/fs/buffer.c' Hunk #5 succeeded at 631 (offset -12 lines). Hunk #7 succeeded at 665 (offset -12 lines). Hunk #9 FAILED at 923. But I get immediate errors