Hi,
On Wed, 20 Oct 1999 13:12:23 +0400, Hans Reiser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
said:
> We don't have inodes in our FS, but we do have stat data, and that
> is dynamically allocated (dynamic per FS, not per file yet, soon but
> not yet each field will be optional and inheritable per file).
> Does XFS d
Experiments sometimes succeed, the code works, try it.
Hans
Mark Ferrell wrote:
> I was under the impression that the reiserfs was more of just an experiemnt in
> making a BTree sorted filesystem.
--
Get Linux (http://www.kernel.org) plus ReiserFS
(http://devlinux.org/namesys). If you sell a
We don't have inodes in our FS, but we do have stat data, and that is
dynamically allocated (dynamic per FS, not per file yet, soon but not yet each
field will be optional and inheritable per file).
Does XFS dynamically allocate? It might.
Best,
Hans
"Stephen C. Tweedie" wrote:
> Hi,
>
I was under the impression that the reiserfs was more of just an experiemnt
in making a BTree sorted filesystem.
"Stephen C. Tweedie" wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 14 Oct 1999 09:22:25 -0700, Thomas Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
said:
> I don't know of any Unix FS with dynamic inode allocation..
Is there
> one
Hi,
On Thu, 14 Oct 1999 09:22:25 -0700, Thomas Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
said:
> I don't know of any Unix FS with dynamic inode allocation.. Is there
> one?
Reiserfs does, doesn't it?
--Stephen
On Thu, Oct 14, 1999 at 09:22:25AM -0700, Thomas Davis wrote:
> I don't know of any Unix FS with dynamic inode allocation.. Is there
> one?
Yet another advantage of XFS.
Mike Stone
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
>
> On Thu, 14 Oct 1999, Thomas Davis wrote:
>
> TD> I don't know of any Unix FS with dynamic inode allocation.. Is there
> TD> one?
>
> fyi: I know WAFL (NetApp) can do it, but it's not a UNIX fs...
>
Compaq's (DEC) Advanced File System (AdvFS) for True64 UNIX (former
On 10/14/1999 09:22 -0700, Thomas Davis wrote:
>> Stephen Waters wrote:
>> >
>> > Thomas Davis wrote:
>> > >
>> > > Stephen Kennedy wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > Filesystem 1k-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
>> > > > /dev/hda5
On Thu, 14 Oct 1999, Thomas Davis wrote:
TD> I don't know of any Unix FS with dynamic inode allocation.. Is there
TD> one?
fyi: I know WAFL (NetApp) can do it, but it's not a UNIX fs...
--
Randomly Generated Tagline:
If it wasn't for Plumbers, you'd have no place to go !
Stephen Waters wrote:
>
> Thomas Davis wrote:
> >
> > Stephen Kennedy wrote:
> > >
> > > Filesystem 1k-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
> > > /dev/hda5 155545 95652 51863 65% /
> > > /dev/hdc6 5653028 232 3143636 41% /home
> > > /de
Thomas Davis wrote:
>
> Stephen Kennedy wrote:
> >
> > Filesystem 1k-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
> > /dev/hda5 155545 95652 51863 65% /
> > /dev/hdc6 5653028 232 3143636 41% /home
> > /dev/hda6 2229516762396
Stephen Kennedy wrote:
>
> Filesystem 1k-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
> /dev/hda5 155545 95652 51863 65% /
> /dev/hdc6 5653028 232 3143636 41% /home
> /dev/hda6 2229516762396 1353864 36% /usr
> /dev/md1
On Thu, Oct 14, 1999 at 12:41:32AM +0100, Stephen Kennedy wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've just encounterd a problem with my raid setup. I seem to be
> getting disk full messages when df reports lots of free space.
> The partitions are on similar disks fireball-st 6.4 and
> fireball-ex 6.4 The stripted par
Hi,
I've just encounterd a problem with my raid setup. I seem to be
getting disk full messages when df reports lots of free space.
The partitions are on similar disks fireball-st 6.4 and
fireball-ex 6.4 The stripted parts are exactly the same size
on each.
Heres a log of what happened:
Steve
14 matches
Mail list logo
