On Thu, 17 Dec 1998, Carlos Carvalho wrote:
> running! NICE! This is much better than the previous version. The only
> glitch is that the 4 raid5syncd threads didn't disappear after
> finishing reconstruction. Shouldn't they?
they should. I'll look into this.
-- mingo
Sending to the list as well to dispell rumors...
Laszlo Vecsey ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote on 17 December 1998 11:52:
>On Thu, 17 Dec 1998, Carlos Carvalho wrote:
>
>> Now the bad news... The raid5 machine locked early this morning, after
>> about 24 hours running. I had to use sys-req b to reb
I've installed the latest raid versions with 2.1.131-ac11 in two
machines, one a raid5 with root-raid, another with raid1. The raid5
machine was upgraded from version 98-09-13, the raid1 one from the
pre-historic 0.36 (with 2.0.33).
Everything worked fine from the beginning. As expected, I had to
