Hello all,
I've made some series of bonnie runs for RAID-0. You can look at the results at
http://plasma-gate.weizmann.ac.il/~fnevgeny/tmp/raid0.gif.
* The best block read performance (that's what I'm mainly interested in) is for
32k or 64k chunk sizes.
* 32k seems also like a "magic" number
MOLNAR Ingo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Jan 1999, Evgeny Stambulchik wrote:
>
> > Software: kernel 2.0.36, raidtools-0.42 (I've also tried
> > raidtools-19981214-0.90 with raid0145-19990108 patch, with practically
> > no performance improvement).
>
> > md0 : active raid0 sdb
On Sun, 24 Jan 1999, Evgeny Stambulchik wrote:
> Software: kernel 2.0.36, raidtools-0.42 (I've also tried
> raidtools-19981214-0.90 with raid0145-19990108 patch, with practically
> no performance improvement).
> md0 : active raid0 sdb3 sdc3 sdd3 3084288 blocks 256k chunks
Hello all,
I need a very fast device for reading/analyzing huge chunks of data, typically
hundreds of MB (which are created by a slow process, so write performance is not
really important for me). From what I've read in the HOWTO, RAID-1 with N disks
should give an N-fold increase in the read per
