Ingo Molnar wrote:
> chunksize does have an important meaning in the linear case: it's
> 'rounding'. We cannot change this unilaterally (it breaks backwards
What is "rounding" mean in the linear case? Is this the rounding of each partition
that is part of the MD drive?
>
> compatibility), and i
James,
On Fri, 26 Nov 1999 08:26:19 -0800 (PST), Mr. James W. Laferriere wrote:
> I vote for maintaining the Doc's , [...]
And do you volunteer to? :-)
Regards,
Robert
Hello Ingo,
On Fri, 26 Nov 1999, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> chunksize does have an important meaning in the linear case: it's
> 'rounding'. We cannot change this unilaterally (it breaks backwards
> compatibility), and it does make sense i believe. [certain disks serve
> requests faster which h
chunksize does have an important meaning in the linear case: it's
'rounding'. We cannot change this unilaterally (it breaks backwards
compatibility), and it does make sense i believe. [certain disks serve
requests faster which have proper alignment and size. I do not think we
should assume that a
On Fri, Nov 26, 1999 at 09:43:06AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hallo,
>
> I have a Sparc 10 with Linux6.1 running I have two disks of 1Gb and
> 1.7Gb.
> I would like to do a linear raid but when I do "raidstart -a /dev/md0
> into shell I receive -> /dev/md0: Invalid argument <-
> and in
Hallo,
I have a Sparc 10 with Linux6.1 running I have two disks of 1Gb
and 1.7Gb.
I would like to do a linear raid but when I do "raidstart -a
/dev/md0
into shell I receive -> /dev/md0: Invalid argument <-
and into consolle
(read) sdb1's sb offset:1026048 [events: 20202020]
md: invalid r
