400MHz with 256MB ram.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Scott Laird
Sent: Saturday, July 17, 1999 1:43 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Horribly bad RAID performance with PERC2 (AMI Megaraid)
On Sat, 17 Jul
Ken Cornetet wrote:
I have a DPT SMartRaid IV (32MB cache) with 3 wide channels controlling 4
Seagate 18GB drives in a RAID 5 configuration. Under Linux (Redhat 6.0) I
only see about 8MB/sec reads and 2.5MB/sec writes. Under NT I see about 8MB
for reads and writes.
I haven't heard much about
On Thu, Jul 15, 1999 at 08:29:47PM -0700, Scott Laird wrote:
On Thu, 15 Jul 1999, Andrew B. Cramer wrote:
You would get good performance if you used a multi-channel controler.
(.02) - Andy
I doubt it -- I got about the same performance with a 3-channel version of
the same
On Sat, 17 Jul 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jul 15, 1999 at 08:29:47PM -0700, Scott Laird wrote:
On Thu, 15 Jul 1999, Andrew B. Cramer wrote:
You would get good performance if you used a multi-channel controler.
(.02) - Andy
I doubt it -- I got about the
You would get good performance if you used a multi-channel controler.
(.02) - Andy
I get really bad performance with the PERC2-SC (single channel)
controller,
using the Bonnie benchmark.
In fact a Pentium with 64 Mbytes and an IDE controller with a singel
disk
outperforms the measured
"Andrew B. Cramer" wrote:
You would get good performance if you used a multi-channel controler.
(.02) - Andy
I see no reason to require the use of multiple channels to get good
performance. I am using an eXtremeRAID controller from Mylex. I built
a machine with the 3 channel version of
On Thu, 15 Jul 1999, Andrew B. Cramer wrote:
You would get good performance if you used a multi-channel controler.
(.02) - Andy
I doubt it -- I got about the same performance with a 3-channel version of
the same card. Search dejanews for details, or ask me and I'll resend my
last post.
