> > It's 552 lines, so I'll go ahead and attach it here with the warning
> > that it is the 4th patch (of 4) to get applied in their .spec file (after
> > .include, .ebda and .cpqarray) and as such may not apply cleanly... it's
> > only got 8 chunks in it though, only the 3rd and 8th of which have
I believe that's the source rpm for lilo. Where is the patch available. This
is the second lilo raid patch I have seen and they're different.
alex
On Thu, 14 Oct 1999, James Manning wrote:
> >%_[ Thursday, October 14, 1999 ] Brian Lew wrote:
> > Can you direct me to where I can get this lilo.r
[ Thursday, October 14, 1999 ] Brian Lew wrote:
> Can you direct me to where I can get this lilo.raid1 patch?
ftp://rpmfind.net/linux/redhat/redhat-6.1/SRPMS/SRPMS/lilo-0.21-10.src.rpm
It's 552 lines, so I'll go ahead and attach it here with the warning
that it is the 4th patch (of 4) to get app
Can you direct me to where I can get this lilo.raid1 patch?
Thanks,
Brian
- Original Message -
From: James Manning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Linux-Raid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, October 14, 1999 9:34 AM
Subject: Re: Lilo and booting with failed first disk
[ Thursday, October 14, 1999 ] Bruno Prior wrote:
> > My Problem:
> > First i tried to use root=/boot-hda1 in lilo.conf.hda below. But this
> > doesn't work. I got the following error from lilo:
[snip]
Since it seems (to me at least) to be The Right Way To Do It(tm), has
anyone used the RH 6.1 l
> My Problem:
> First i tried to use root=/boot-hda1 in lilo.conf.hda below. But this
> doesn't work. I got the following error from lilo:
> Sorry, don't know how to handle device 0x0906
> ... but /boot-hda1 was mounted to /dev/hda1 which is a nonraid ext2
> partition.
> o.k. but when i mount /dev
[ Monday, September 13, 1999 ] christophe leroy wrote:
> What you must do is remove /dev/hda, then write your lilo record.
I don't believe that's the case.
from looking at "man lilo.conf", you can pass bios=0x80 in the
disk=/dev/hdc stanza to let lilo know that when you're booting
hdc it'll be s
This is because when you write your boot record on /dev/hdc, /dev/hda is there
so your /dev/hdc is seen as bios disk 0x81, but when you boot without
/dev/hda,
it is bios disk 0x80, so lilo which try and load from 0x81 fails.
What you must do is remove /dev/hda, then write your lilo record.
Chris
Hello!
I set up a raid-1-system with root-raid. I created boot-partitions
(normal non-raid ext2 partitions) not included in the raid. One on
/dev/hda1 and the other /dev/hdc1. hdc1 is thought for the situation if
hda1 fails.
My copy my lilo.conf, raidtab and my lilo-install-script below this
mail
