I have an Intel P-III running at 450 MHz on an Intel SE440BX-2
motherboard with patched 2.2.14 kernel raidtools 0.90

RAID-5 array consists of 3 "Maxtor 51536U3" drives.  One drive is master
on secondary motherboard IDE port. (no slave)
The other 2 are alone on the primary and secondary of a Promise Ultra
ATA/66.  The raid is configured as follows:

[root@porgy /proc]# cat mdstat
Personalities : [raid5] 
read_ahead 1024 sectors
md0 : active raid5 hdg1[1] hde1[0] hdc1[2] 10005120 blocks level 5, 64k
chunk, algorithm 0 [3/3] [UUU]
md1 : active raid5 hdg5[2] hde5[1] hdc5[0] 10005120 blocks level 5, 64k
chunk, algorithm 0 [3/3] [UUU]
md2 : active raid5 hdg6[2] hde6[1] hdc6[0] 10004096 blocks level 5, 64k
chunk, algorithm 0 [3/3] [UUU]
unused devices: <none>
[root@porgy /proc]# 

The following test was run on /dev/md2 mounted as /usr1

[degan@porgy tiobench-0.29]$ ./tiobench.pl --block 4096
No size specified, using 510 MB
Size is MB, BlkSz is Bytes, Read, Write, and Seeks are MB/sec

         File   Block  Num  Seq Read    Rand Read   Seq Write  Rand
Write
  Dir    Size   Size   Thr Rate (CPU%) Rate (CPU%) Rate (CPU%) Rate
(CPU%)
------- ------ ------- --- ----------- ----------- -----------
-----------
   .     510    4096    1  21.63 10.4% 0.757 0.87% 19.62 17.1% 0.799
2.45%
   .     510    4096    2  22.89 12.0% 0.938 0.90% 20.18 17.7% 0.792
2.38%
   .     510    4096    4  21.85 12.5% 1.113 1.09% 20.37 18.1% 0.784
2.19%
   .     510    4096    8  20.57 13.1% 1.252 1.34% 20.54 18.5% 0.776
2.34%


I am not sure what to make of the results and am happy with my RAID
operation.
I only post them FYI.


+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
| Douglas Egan                            Wind River              |
|                                                                 |
| Tel   : 847-837-1530                                            |
| Fax   : 847-949-1368                                            |
| HTTP  : http://www.windriver.com                                |
| Email : [EMAIL PROTECTED]                                 |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------+

Reply via email to