Dave Wreski wrote:
>
> > Just get the Alan Cox patches from your favorite kernel.org mirror, a
> > clean 2.2.13 kernel tree, and apply. No failures, just good clean
> > raiding.
>
> Is it in fact the case that the pre-patch-2.2.14-11 (released today) patch
> has the latest raid drivers in it? T
> Just get the Alan Cox patches from your favorite kernel.org mirror, a
> clean 2.2.13 kernel tree, and apply. No failures, just good clean
> raiding.
Is it in fact the case that the pre-patch-2.2.14-11 (released today) patch
has the latest raid drivers in it? That sure seems to be what you are
Bill Anderson wrote:
>
> Anders Qvist wrote:
> >
> > I would prefer to compile a 2.3.13+ kernel in order to get the most out
> > of my Matrox G400 (dual) graphics card. However, I have a system booting
> > off a raid 0 partition, so I need the new-style raid. There does not seem
> > to be raid014
Anders Qvist wrote:
>
> I would prefer to compile a 2.3.13+ kernel in order to get the most out
> of my Matrox G400 (dual) graphics card. However, I have a system booting
> off a raid 0 partition, so I need the new-style raid. There does not seem
> to be raid0145 patches for 2.3 kernels and patch
I would prefer to compile a 2.3.13+ kernel in order to get the most out
of my Matrox G400 (dual) graphics card. However, I have a system booting
off a raid 0 partition, so I need the new-style raid. There does not seem
to be raid0145 patches for 2.3 kernels and patching the 19990824 version
onto 2
