> The same-ide-channel problem is that you don't get to do that... it's
> one at a time, so you'll get something more like an average (harmonic
> mean I'd guess... don't make me think :) of the two rates, as over time
> you'll be getting data at slow rate, fast rate, slow rate, fast rate, etc
> (a
[ Sunday, September 19, 1999 ] Glenn McGrath wrote:
> Should the maximum performance of raid0 be twice the speed of the slowest
> drive, or the agregate of the two drives speed ?
> What speeds are achievable practically?
Amdahl's Law :)
For separate IDE channels or SCSI, or any other situation w
Hi, in my current raid setup i have one fast drive (Quantum KA), and one
slow drive (Quantum ST).
I am not useing the Quantum KA in UDMA mode (old motherboard; PIIX3
controller) but the question is still relavent i believe.
Should the maximum performance of raid0 be twice the speed of the slowest
